Claude Skills by thedixitjain

Use when responding after a Journal of Economic Growth revise-and-resubmit to organize responses about growth mechanisms, model assumptions, empirical identification, calibration sensitivity, data availability, and Springer revision files.

Use when navigating the Journal of Economic Growth (JEG) editorial process — the Springer Nature submission path, editor screening for growth-and-development fit, theory and empirics referee expectations, desk-reject patterns, and decision-stage planning across review rounds.

Use when running the final Journal of Economic Growth submission preflight through Springer Nature, including abstract length, title-page metadata, LaTeX or Word source files, declarations, data availability, and Open Choice fee checks.

Use when preparing Journal of Economic Growth exhibits: growth-regression tables, convergence plots, transition paths, calibration moments, historical-data maps, robustness tables, and appendix diagnostics.

Use when deciding whether a project is a first-order economic-growth question that fits the Journal of Economic Growth (JEG) — a specialist Springer Nature outlet for growth and dynamic macroeconomics, not a general-interest journal. Screens scope, ambition, and theory/empirics fit before writing.

Use when orienting and sequencing a full manuscript lifecycle for the Journal of Economic Growth (JEG) — a specialist Springer Nature outlet for economic growth and dynamic macroeconomics spanning theory and empirics. Routes to the other eleven jeg skills and branches by paper type.

Use when staking a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript's contribution against both the geographical-economics and human-geography frontiers, and against sibling journals. Sharpens positioning; it does not invent citations.

Use when staking a Journal of Economic Theory (JET) contribution against the theory frontier — show precisely which assumption is weakened, which result is generalized, or which new phenomenon is characterized relative to the closest existing theorems. Positions the result; it is not a standalone survey.

Use when the related-work section of a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) manuscript reads like a list and the marginal contribution relative to the top-3 finance frontier is not sharp. Builds the positioning argument; it does not assess identification or design.

Use when working on a Journal of Financial Intermediation manuscript to stake the contribution against the banking and financial-intermediation frontier — name the closest intermediation papers and the precise mechanism gap you fill. It positions; it does not write a standalone survey.

Use when positioning a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript against the microstructure frontier and its broad-finance siblings — staking a contribution the markets-literature insiders will recognize. Positions; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when positioning a Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) manuscript against the finance frontier — corporate finance, investments, asset pricing, market microstructure, and financial institutions. Use to stake a precise contribution against the relevant literature without a standalone survey, so the paper reads as new to a quantitative-finance audience.

Use when the contribution of a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript relative to the health-economics frontier is fuzzy or undersold. Stakes the marginal contribution against the right health-econ literatures; it does not run the analysis or invent citations.

Use when positioning a Journal of Human Resources manuscript against applied microeconomics, labor, education, health, development, discrimination, retirement, and policy literatures, with explicit reconciliation to prior estimates.

Use when positioning a Journal of International Business Studies (JIBS) manuscript within the international-business conversation — joining a live IB debate, problematizing rather than gap-spotting, and situating the work against the JIBS canon and adjacent IB outlets. Frames the conversation; it does not state the final contribution claim (jibs-contribution-framing).

Use to position a Journal of International Economics (JIE) manuscript against the international-trade or open-economy-macro frontier — staking the contribution against gravity/structural-trade or international-finance literatures without writing a standalone survey. Sharpens positioning; it does not draft the paper.

Use when articulating what a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript contributes — converting results into theory advances for international marketing and decisions for border-crossing managers, and defending against the \"context extension\" verdict. It frames the payoff; jim-writing-style polishes the prose.

Use when estimating and reporting results for a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript — measurement-invariance testing (MGCFA/alignment), multilevel models with country-level predictors, multi-group SEM, and multi-country panels. It executes and reports; jim-methods designed the study.

Use when locating a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript inside the international marketing literature — mapping the conversation, building the positioning table, and pre-empting the \"incremental extension\" verdict. It positions the claim; jim-contribution-framing writes the payoff.

Use when designing a multi-country or cross-cultural study for a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript — country selection, sampling and translation equivalence, measurement-invariance planning, cross-cultural experiments, and export/entry-mode secondary data. It designs; jim-data-analysis estimates and reports.

Use when responding to a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) decision letter — triaging reviewer demands, deciding whether to collect new-country data, and writing the point-by-point response. It manages the revision round; the upstream skills execute the actual fixes.

Use when a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript is under review or about to be — understanding the editorial pipeline, decision categories, desk-reject triggers, and how to wait productively. It explains the process; jim-rebuttal handles the response once a letter arrives.

Use when running the final preflight for a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) submission — the ScholarOne portal, the two-file anonymized package, formatting caps, and declarations. It clears the runway; post-decision strategy belongs to jim-rebuttal.

Use when building or pruning the exhibits of a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript — the invariance table, per-country descriptives, cross-level model figures, and fitting everything inside the 50-page all-inclusive cap. It shapes exhibits; jim-data-analysis produced the numbers.

Use when building or repairing the conceptual framework of a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript — theorizing why effects differ across countries, choosing cultural/institutional lenses, and drafting cross-national hypotheses. It builds the mechanism; jim-literature-positioning stakes the claim against prior work.

Use when choosing or auditing a research question for a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript — testing whether the international dimension is the theoretical core and whether JIM beats sibling outlets. It vets the question; jim-theory-development builds the mechanism.

Use when starting or unblocking a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript and you need to pick the right jim-* sub-skill for the current stage, from first idea through the response letter. It routes to the specialist skills; it does not do their work.

Use when staking a Journal of International Money and Finance (JIMF) manuscript's contribution against the international-finance frontier and its sibling journals. Sharpens positioning; it does not invent evidence, exemplars, or citations.

Use when the marginal contribution of a The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) manuscript is fuzzy or undersold and must be staked precisely against prior law-and-economics work. Positions the contribution; it does not fix the identification (jle-identification) or the prose (jle-writing-style).

Use when stating the contribution of a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — making the substantive insight explicit and discharging JM's dual mandate of managerial, policy, and societal relevance. Frames the contribution; it does not run the analysis (jm-data-analysis) or polish the prose (jm-writing-style).

Use when running and reporting the statistical analysis for a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — the right estimator for a big-tent design, JM's exact p-value / standard-error / effect-size reporting mandate, identification and robustness, and the JM Dataverse replication packet. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (jm-methods) or frame the contribution (jm-contribution-framing).

Use when positioning a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript in the literature — joining a substantive marketing conversation and defending against the \"new-context replication\" rejection. Positions the paper; it does not build the mechanism (jm-theory-development) or write the contribution statement (jm-contribution-framing).

Use when choosing and defending the research design for a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — matching a \"big tent\" method (experiment, field study, survey, secondary data, qualitative) to a substantive marketing question, with field realism and identification in mind. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation (jm-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (jm-contribution-framing).

Use when planning a revision and drafting the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of Marketing (JM) R&R — prioritizing the Coeditor's decisive concerns, strengthening substantive novelty and managerial relevance, and keeping the double-anonymized rules. Plans and drafts the response; it does not interpret the original decision (jm-review-process).

Use when understanding how Journal of Marketing (JM) review and decisions work — the double-anonymized process, the Coeditor structure, the substantive-and-relevance evaluation bar, and how to read a decision letter. Explains the process and reads the letter; it does not draft the response (jm-rebuttal).

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — the ScholarOne (Sage Track) portal, double-anonymized formatting, the 50-page inclusive limit, exact-statistic reporting, the Data Availability Statement, and the JM Dataverse plan. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (jm-rebuttal).

Use when building the tables and figures for a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — exact-statistic result tables, interaction/mechanism plots, and managerial-takeaway exhibits in AMA house style, all counting against the 50-page limit. Finalizes exhibits; it does not run the analysis (jm-data-analysis) or polish the prose (jm-writing-style).

Use when building the conceptual logic for a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — grounding theory in a real-world marketing phenomenon, deriving predictions, and accommodating an empirics-first route. Builds the argument; it does not select the question (jm-topic-selection) or run the analysis (jm-data-analysis).

Use when choosing or sharpening a research question for the Journal of Marketing (JM) — testing whether it is substantive, managerially/societally relevant, and JM-fit (vs. JMR, Marketing Science, or JCR). Locks the question; it does not build the conceptual logic (jm-theory-development) or frame the contribution (jm-contribution-framing).

Use when deciding which jm-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when staking a Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB) manuscript's contribution against the monetary, banking, and macro-finance literature and its sibling journals. Sharpens the \"what is new and why JMCB\" claim; it does not invent citations or evidence.

Use when positioning a Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) manuscript against the monetary-economics and macroeconomics frontier — staking the contribution against monetary-policy, business-cycle, DSGE, intermediation, and expectations literatures without writing a standalone survey.

Use when the contribution-relative-to-prior-work is the bottleneck for a Journal of Management (JOM) manuscript — staking the gap against the right conversation and against sibling journals (AMJ, SMJ, JMS, Org Science). Positions the paper; it does not build the theory (jmgmt-theory-development) or write the discussion (jmgmt-contribution-framing).

Use when staking a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) manuscript's contribution against the IS literature and the basket siblings — showing it advances an IS-management/economics conversation rather than only a reference discipline. Positions the work; it does not build the mechanism (jmis-theory-development) or write the contribution statement (jmis-contribution-framing).

Use when positioning a Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) manuscript against the closest behavioral, modeling, and methods literatures so the contribution reads as a genuine advance — not a better application of an existing design or model. Spans both of JMR's methodological streams and uses AMA author-year citation conventions.

Use when positioning the contribution against the literature for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) manuscript — locating the paper in a named theoretical conversation and showing what it adds. Stakes the contribution; it does not build the mechanism (jms-theory-development) or write the closing contribution paragraph (jms-contribution-framing).

Use when judging whether a manuscript fits 《管理科学学报》 (Journal of Management Sciences in China) — a 数理/定量 (mathematical / quantitative) management-science journal whose deliverable is a model plus provable properties plus an algorithm. Use when the draft is regression coefficients + policy talk, or survey-SEM, to detect OFF-FIT and re-route to 管理世界 / 南开管理评论 / 金融研究. Use before drafting and whenever a reviewer asks whether the contribution is in method or in conclusion.

Use when positioning a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript against the I-O literature so the theoretical contribution is unmistakable. JAP expects the gap and the advance stated against the closest prior work — and a clear distinction from sibling venues (Personnel Psychology, AMJ, OBHDP, JOB). Stakes the contribution; it does not write the literature review.

Use when positioning a Journal of Communication (JoC) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a field-wide contribution. JoC readers span communication subfields and traditions, so the paper must engage the literatures they expect rather than only a single platform or topic niche. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

Use when the contribution of a Journal of Econometrics (JoE) manuscript relative to the econometrics literature is fuzzy or undersold. Locates the paper precisely against the nearest estimators, tests, and asymptotic results so referees see the methodological delta.