Use when positioning a Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) manuscript against the monetary-economics and macroeconomics frontier — staking the contribution against monetary-policy, business-cycle, DSGE, intermediation, and expectations literatures without writing a standalone survey.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add thedixitjain/the-mega-skill-library --skill jme-literature-positioning --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jme Literature Positioning?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thedixitjain-jme-literature-positioning)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jme-literature-positioning
description: "Use when positioning a Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) manuscript against the monetary-economics and macroeconomics frontier — staking the contribution against monetary-policy, business-cycle, DSGE, intermediation, and expectations literatures without writing a standalone survey."
category: marketing-and-growth
source_repo: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
source_path: "Journal-of-Monetary-Economics-Skills/skills/jme-literature-positioning/SKILL.md"
source_url: https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/blob/HEAD/Journal-of-Monetary-Economics-Skills/skills/jme-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
---
# Literature Positioning (jme-literature-positioning)
## When to trigger
- The contribution relative to prior monetary/macro work is fuzzy or oversold
- Reviewers might say "this is already known" or "this is a known DSGE result"
- The related-work section reads as a survey instead of a stake in the ground
- You are unsure which strands (policy transmission, frictions, expectations) you build on and beat
## How JME referees read the literature
JME draws on overlapping macro literatures: **monetary-policy transmission** (the interest-rate, credit, and risk-taking channels), **New Keynesian / DSGE** modeling, **financial intermediation and frictions** (Bernanke–Gertler–Gilchrist-style accelerators, Gertler–Kiyotaki banking), **business cycles and growth**, **fiscal–monetary interactions**, and **expectations / information** (rational, sticky, and behavioral). With **single anonymized review** (referees know who you are) and a **minimum of two reviewers**, you should assume your referees are specialists in exactly the strand you extend — so cite the immediate frontier precisely and do not paper over the closest competitor.
Because JME enforces a **40-page** limit on accepted papers, the literature discussion must be lean: place the contribution in two or three sentences, not a multi-page tour. Journal titles in the reference list are **spelled out in full** (not abbreviated), references are **author-date**, and the reference list sits **after appendices but before tables and figures** — so positioning lives in the prose, not in a long bibliography.
## Positioning moves
- **Name the closest paper(s)** and state in one sentence what you add (a new shock, a new mechanism, a new moment matched, a new policy counterfactual).
- **Distinguish empirical vs. theoretical contribution** explicitly — JME values both, but a reviewer wants to know which lever you are pulling.
- **Pre-empt "already known"**: if a result resembles a known DSGE prediction, say precisely what is novel (new data, relaxed assumption, quantitative magnitude, identification).
- **Tie to policy** where relevant — a positioning that connects to a live central-banking or fiscal question reads as first-order.
## Checklist
- [ ] The 2-3 closest papers named, with the marginal contribution stated in one sentence each
- [ ] Empirical and theoretical contributions separated
- [ ] The "already known" objection pre-empted
- [ ] References are author-date, journal titles spelled out in full
- [ ] No standalone survey; positioning is lean enough for the 40-page cap
## Positioning pass for Journal of Monetary Economics
Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the main macro object, the identifying variation, and the policy-relevant counterfactual; then judge whether the current manuscript answers the venue's real reader: macro and monetary economists who expect the shock, mechanism, and policy margin to be visible early.
- **Do the pass:** Build a three-column map: incumbent conversation, unresolved tension, and this manuscript's delta; include one sibling-venue omission that would make a referee doubt the fit.
- **Return a ledger:** give `claim / evidence / risk / manuscript location` rows, so the next agent can edit rather than rediscover the issue.
- **Sibling guard:** compare against JIE for open-economy trade/finance emphasis, RED for dynamic macro theory, AEJ Macro for broader field positioning; if a sibling owns the contribution, recommend re-routing before polishing format.
- **Stop condition:** do not give submission-ready advice until the pack's `resources/official-source-map.md` has been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.
## Output format
```
【Strand(s)】policy transmission / DSGE / intermediation / expectations / ...
【Closest prior work】[paper → what we add]
【Empirical contribution】one line
【Theoretical contribution】one line
【"Already known?" rebuttal】one line
【Next step】jme-contribution-framing
```
---
**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `Journal-of-Monetary-Economics-Skills/skills/jme-literature-positioning/SKILL.md`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!