Claude Skills by thedixitjain

当你在需要理解《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 的双盲三审制审稿流程、各环节时间进度与作者可施加的杠杆时调用。建模编辑初审→双盲外审→退修/复审(多轮)→主编终审的完整链路，说明作者承诺前置、双盲对作者的约束、退修期限与重新送审、状态查询，帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的评审各节点做出正确动作、管理预期并避免流程性失误。

当你在向《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 正式提交稿件前做投稿就绪审计时调用。覆盖官网 aas.net.cn 的 ScholarOne 投审稿系统(aas-cn)、双盲匿名化(删除页眉页脚/标题下方/尾注/文件名中的作者单位基金号)、全部作者签名加盖第一作者单位公章的《作者承诺》前置提交、只收原创非翻译稿与不接收 AI 署名、学术不端查重、栏目(综述/论文/短文)归属与退稿风险分诊。适用于把一份控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文稿打磨到符合本刊双盲三审制门槛的场景。

当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 组织正文与附录/补充材料、决定哪些内容进正文哪些进附录时调用。给出按\"决定性\"划分正文与附录的原则、冗长证明与额外仿真的安置、补充材料/多媒体附件的组织与命名、以及配合双盲的匿名化，帮助控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文长文在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的篇幅与体例约束下保持正文紧凑而证据完整。

当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 确定选题、判断稿件是否契合本刊控制与自动化学科定位、以及在综述/论文/短文三类栏目间定位时调用。帮助辨析本刊与兄弟中文刊(计算机学报/软件学报/电子学报/计算机研究与发展/计算机科学)的学科分工，评估创新性与贡献可数性，避免\"主题超范围\"\"无新意\"\"重复前人\"等初审退稿理由，并把选题打磨到匹配 Acta Automatica Sinica 的控制/模式识别/机器人/智能系统侧重与中英文双语综述长文传统。

当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 规划一次完整投稿的时间线、把 12 个技能编排成从选题到见刊的流水线时调用。给出选题定位→写作→实验→匿名投稿→双盲三审→多轮退修→录用定稿的阶段划分、每阶段的准入准出、里程碑与常见延误点，帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的双盲三审制与中英文双语综述长文传统下合理排期，避免作者承诺漏交、双盲泄露、退修超期等踩坑，并在每个节点指明应调用哪个 aas- 技能。

Manage Telegram channel access — approve pairings, edit allowlists, set DM/group policy. Use when the user asks to pair, approve someone, check who's allowed, or change policy for the Telegram channel.

Manage iMessage channel access — approve pairings, edit allowlists, set DM/group policy. Use when the user asks to pair, approve someone, check who's allowed, or change policy for the iMessage channel.

Manage Discord channel access — approve pairings, edit allowlists, set DM/group policy. Use when the user asks to pair, approve someone, check who's allowed, or change policy for the Discord channel.

Triage acc's open promises and close them with honest real-world verdicts via acc_act(runtime=\"outcome\").

Drain acc's deliberation queue — open/waiting brain_frames checkpointed by headless runs — via acc_act(runtime=\"continue\").

Use when drafting the ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) rebuttal — turning multiple anonymous reviews into one focused, anonymous response that fixes factual errors first, adds small confirmatory cross-modal results, concedes calibratedly, and stays inside policy (anonymous, no new external links), written for the area chair who decides.

Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.

Extract action items from today's Granola/Grain meetings, create Todoist tasks, complete fulfilled tasks, and draft meeting-triggered follow-up emails. Use when running the daily action items cron, post-meeting cron, or when user asks to process meeting action items. NOT for general email drafting without meeting context.

Inverts burden of proof for code additions. Use when reviewing PRs, planning refactors, or running unbloat to challenge every addition's necessity.

../../../engineering-team/skills/adversarial-reviewer/SKILL.md

Use when choosing suggested and opposed referees for an Advanced Materials submission and pre-empting the objections materials reviewers most often raise. Plans referee selection and objection defense; does not write the manuscript or the rebuttal.

Use when responding to Advanced Materials reviewer reports and an editor's decision — major or minor revision, or a rejection with a resubmission or transfer path. Structures the response and the manuscript changes; does not perform the underlying new experiments.

Use when deciding whether a materials result clears Advanced Materials' advance-and-broad-impact gate, or whether it belongs in Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Science, Small, or Advanced Materials Interfaces. Diagnoses venue fit; does not write or characterize the material.

Use when deciding which advmat-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from scope-fit through revision for an Advanced Materials (Adv. Mater.) manuscript. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

Advogado criminalista especializado em Maria da Penha, violencia domestica, feminicidio, direito penal brasileiro, medidas protetivas, inquerito policial e acao penal.

Advogado especialista em todas as areas do Direito brasileiro: familia, criminal, trabalhista, tributario, consumidor, imobiliario, empresarial, civil e constitucional.

Use when an AEJ: Economic Policy decision letter (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) has arrived and a response-letter strategy and revision plan are needed. Structures the response to referees and editor with policy-relevance front and center; it does not run new estimation or redesign identification from scratch.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for AEJ: Economic Policy via the AEA online submission system — single-blind review front matter, JEL codes, submission and publication fees, format, the Data and Code Availability Statement, and disclosure. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when deciding whether a project fits AEJ: Economic Policy rather than J. Public Economics, AEJ: Applied, or AER, and when sharpening the policy question and its welfare stake for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript. Frames fit and the policy-question-first contribution; it does not design the identification or run estimation.

Use when deciding which aejpol-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when responding to an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) conditional-accept decision — addressing the editor's letter within the short window, usually without a second referee round. Drafts a concise, decisive response and revision plan; it does not redo the analysis (see aeri-robustness / aeri-identification).

Use when deciding which robustness checks belong in the few in-text words of an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript versus the online Supplemental Appendix. Triages checks against the length cap; it does not design the identification (see aeri-identification).

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) via the AEA/ScholarOne submission system — the word-count and exhibit-count gates, abstract limit, fees, author metadata, declarations, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when deciding which aeri-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing work on a short-format manuscript from topic selection through the conditional-accept response for an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

在为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 撰写审稿意见答复与修回说明时调用。适用于收到编辑部\"修改后再审/退修\"通知后，逐条回应外审专家意见、撰写\"修改说明\"对照表、在正文中标注修改痕迹、处理相互矛盾或要求补做实验的意见、把握修回时限与再审轮次。帮助电子/信息/通信/信号处理方向的中文稿件在《电子学报》多级审理中稳步走向录用，避免因答复不规范或情绪化措辞被再次退修甚至退稿。

当稿件被《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 录用后进入定稿、校样与清样阶段时使用。覆盖录用通知后的版权协议签署、按最终排版规范核对中英文题名/摘要/关键词/中图分类号、补全双盲阶段隐去的作者信息与基金编号、GB/T 7714 参考文献终校、图表与公式的印刷级质量、校样(清样)一校二校流程、版面费缴纳、DOI 与出版时序确认。帮助电子/信息/通信方向作者把已录用稿件零差错地送到《电子学报》正式出版。

当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 稿件设计与呈现实验/仿真时使用。覆盖电子/信息/信号处理/通信类工作的实验目标与假设、数据集与仿真设置、基线与对比公平性、评价指标(SNR/BER/误差/准确率/资源占用)、消融与参数敏感性、统计显著性与多次运行、图表呈现规范、以及硬件/FPGA/测量实验的条件报告。帮助作者用严谨、可复现、对比公平的实验证据支撑创新点，抵御《电子学报》外审专家对\"实验不充分、对比不公平、结果偶然\"的质疑。

在向《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 正式提交稿件前做投稿就绪审计时调用。覆盖官网 ejournal.org.cn 在线投稿系统、注册与稿件同步、官方 Word/LaTeX 模板、中英文摘要与关键词、中图分类号(TN 为主)、GB/T 7714 参考文献、双盲评审的匿名化要求、稿件评审费(中文约 199 元/英文约 260 元 待核实以系统为准)、涉密脱敏、栏目归属与稿件类型选择，并在上传前做退稿风险分诊。适用于把一份电子/信息/通信/信号处理方向的中文原创论文打磨到符合本刊四级审理门槛的场景。

当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 稿件组织附录与补充材料时使用。覆盖哪些内容应放正文、哪些应下沉到附录/在线补充材料、多媒体附件(音视频/信号波形/大数据表)的提交方式、公式推导与完整证明的呈现、扩展实验与超参数表、双盲阶段补充材料的匿名化、以及与正文的引用对应关系。帮助电子/信息/信号处理方向作者在《电子学报》有限正文篇幅内保持主线清晰，同时用补充材料完整承载可复现细节与扩展证据。

'Generates customized business agreements for 10 common relationship types with plain English annotations. Use when formalizing a business relationship, creating a partnership agreement, or drafting a service contract from scratch. Trigger with \"/agreement-generator\" or \"create a freelancer agreement\". '

Use when choosing and defending an interpretive approach for an American Historical Review (AHR) manuscript — social, cultural, intellectual, political, economic, transnational, global, microhistory, or the history of knowledge. The AHR welcomes many methods judged on their own terms. Sharpens interpretation and scale; it does not impose a single template.

Use when responding to an American Historical Review (AHR) decision — a revise-and-resubmit or rejection. AHR articles are read by at least six demanding specialists, so the response must address expert reports while protecting the argument and keeping the manuscript anonymized. Structures the revision and response letter; it does not fabricate new evidence.

Use when handling primary sources and archives for an American Historical Review (AHR) manuscript — distinguishing primary from secondary, criticizing sources, citing manuscripts and collections in Chicago notes, and clearing image permissions. The AHR judges history on the quality and criticism of its evidence. Strengthens source work; it does not invent archival material.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for The American Historical Review (AHR) via ScholarOne — masked-author preparation, the roughly 8,000-word target, Chicago notes, manuscript formatting, image alt-text and permissions, and the exclusivity declaration. Final checks; it does not draft content.

'Build NFT collection explorer and smart contract interaction with Alchemy. Use when fetching NFT metadata, building galleries, reading contract state, or implementing NFT marketplace features. Trigger: \"alchemy NFT\", \"alchemy smart contract\", \"alchemy collection\", \"alchemy NFT metadata\", \"alchemy contract read\". '

'Implement Algolia search with filters, facets, highlighting, and pagination. The primary money-path workflow: search records, apply filters, display results. Trigger: \"algolia search\", \"search with algolia\", \"algolia filters\", \"algolia facets\", \"algolia search implementation\". '

Creating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems. Create original algorithmic art rather than copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations.

Create \"[Competitor] alternative\" and comparison pages for developer tools. Build honest, high-converting comparison content that ranks for competitive search terms. Trigger phrases: \"alternatives page\", \"comparison page\", \"vs page\", \"[competitor] alternative\", \"competitor comparison\",...

Use when appraising the cumulative evidence and ensuring balance in an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — weighing conflicting findings by credibility, steelmanning rival schools, and handling the author's own work even-handedly. Audits evidence quality and fairness; it does not design the framework (amann-organizing-framework) or build exhibits (amann-tables-figures).

Use when building the novel integrative framework that an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review must deliver — the theory-advancing \"new way of seeing the field\" that is the acceptance bar, not a catalog of papers. Designs the spine; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or appraise evidence balance (amann-evidence-standards).

Use when building the conceptual/theoretical argument of an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript into a four-field contribution — whether the work is ethnographic, archaeological, biological, or linguistic. AA rewards a portable concept and reflexive argument over a bare finding or thick description alone. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses or write fieldnotes.

Use when articulating and differentiating the theoretical contribution of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — showing precisely what is NEW versus prior theory and why it matters. Frames the contribution; it does NOT build the theory (amr-theory-development) or check its internal logic (amr-data-analysis).

Use when you need to understand the Academy of Management Review (AMR) developmental, multi-round review and interpret a decision letter focused on theoretical novelty and logical soundness. Explains the process and decision types; it does NOT draft the response document (that is amr-rebuttal).

Use when building the conceptual exhibits of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — process models, 2x2 typologies, multi-level frameworks, and propositions tables that carry theoretical work. These are CONCEPTUAL figures, NOT data plots; AMR has no charts of results because it has no data.

Use when the theoretical puzzle is the bottleneck for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — deciding whether an idea is theory-worthy and AMR-fit before any theorizing begins. Frames the puzzle; it does NOT build constructs (that is amr-theory-development) or design any empirical study (AMR has none).