Inspect, patch, validate, publish, or confirm OpenClaw GHSA security advisories and private-fork state.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ZDStudios/AIOS --skill openclaw-ghsa-maintainer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Openclaw Ghsa Maintainer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/zdstudios-openclaw-ghsa-maintainer)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: openclaw-ghsa-maintainer
description: "Inspect, patch, validate, publish, or confirm OpenClaw GHSA security advisories and private-fork state."
---
# OpenClaw GHSA Maintainer
Use this skill for repo security advisory workflow only. Keep general release work in `release-openclaw-maintainer`.
## Respect advisory guardrails
- Before reviewing or publishing a repo advisory, read `SECURITY.md`.
- Ask permission before any publish action.
- Treat this skill as GHSA-only. Do not use it for stable or beta release work.
## Fetch and inspect advisory state
Fetch the current advisory and the latest published npm version:
```bash
gh api /repos/openclaw/openclaw/security-advisories/<GHSA>
npm view openclaw version --userconfig "$(mktemp)"
```
Use the fetch output to confirm the advisory state, linked private fork, and vulnerability payload shape before patching.
## Verify private fork PRs are closed
Before publishing, verify that the advisory's private fork has no open PRs:
```bash
fork=$(gh api /repos/openclaw/openclaw/security-advisories/<GHSA> | jq -r .private_fork.full_name)
gh pr list -R "$fork" --state open
```
The PR list must be empty before publish.
## Prepare advisory Markdown and JSON safely
- Write advisory Markdown via heredoc to a temp file. Do not use escaped `\n` strings.
- Build PATCH payload JSON with `jq`, not hand-escaped shell JSON.
Example pattern:
```bash
cat > /tmp/ghsa.desc.md <<'EOF'
<markdown description>
EOF
jq -n --rawfile desc /tmp/ghsa.desc.md \
'{summary,severity,description:$desc,vulnerabilities:[...]}' \
> /tmp/ghsa.patch.json
```
## Apply PATCH calls in the correct sequence
- Do not set `severity` and `cvss_vector_string` in the same PATCH call.
- Use separate calls when the advisory requires both fields.
- Publish by PATCHing the advisory and setting `"state":"published"`. There is no separate `/publish` endpoint.
Example shape:
```bash
gh api -X PATCH /repos/openclaw/openclaw/security-advisories/<GHSA> \
--input /tmp/ghsa.patch.json
```
## Publish and verify success
After publish, re-fetch the advisory and confirm:
- `state=published`
- `published_at` is set
- the description does not contain literal escaped `\\n`
Verification pattern:
```bash
gh api /repos/openclaw/openclaw/security-advisories/<GHSA>
jq -r .description < /tmp/ghsa.refetch.json | rg '\\\\n'
```
## Common GHSA footguns
- Publishing fails with HTTP 422 if required fields are missing or the private fork still has open PRs.
- A payload that looks correct in shell can still be wrong if Markdown was assembled with escaped newline strings.
- Advisory PATCH sequencing matters; separate field updates when GHSA API constraints require it.
- Public hardening/no-publish comments and draft text should avoid raw commit hashes, PR titles/numbers, and fix-mechanism summaries. Prefer patched-version fields or release-only wording; keep SHAs, PRs, and implementation notes in internal evidence.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!