Parallelize work via six patterns: built-in agents (Engineer/Architect/Algorithm/Explore/Plan via Task), worktree-isolated agents (conflict-free parallel file edits), background agents (run_in_background: true, non-blocking), custom agents (ComposeAgent via Agents skill → Task general-purpose), agent teams (TeamCreate + TaskCreate + SendMessage for multi-turn peer coordination), and parallel task dispatch (N identical operations). Two-tier delegation: lightweight (haiku, max_turns=3, one-shot...
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ZDStudios/AIOS --skill Delegation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Delegation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/zdstudios-delegation-aios)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: Delegation
description: "Parallelize work via six patterns: built-in agents (Engineer/Architect/Algorithm/Explore/Plan via Task), worktree-isolated agents (conflict-free parallel file edits), background agents (run_in_background: true, non-blocking), custom agents (ComposeAgent via Agents skill → Task general-purpose), agent teams (TeamCreate + TaskCreate + SendMessage for multi-turn peer coordination), and parallel task dispatch (N identical operations). Two-tier delegation: lightweight (haiku, max_turns=3, one-shot extraction/classification) vs full (multi-step, tool use, iteration). Decision rule — agents need to talk to each other or share state → Teams; independent one-shot work → Subagents. Auto-invoked by Algorithm when 3+ independent workstreams exist at Extended+ effort. USE WHEN 3+ workstreams, parallel execution, agent specialization, agent team, swarm, spawn agents, create team, fan out, divide and conquer, multi-agent, coordinate agents. NOT FOR single-agent custom personality composition (use Agents skill)."
effort: medium
---
# Delegation — Agent Orchestration & Parallelization
**Auto-invoked by the Algorithm when work can be parallelized or requires agent specialization.**
## 🚨 CRITICAL ROUTING — Two COMPLETELY Different Systems
| the user Says | System | Tool | What Happens |
|-------------|--------|------|-------------|
| "**custom agents**", "**specialized agents**", "spin up agents", "launch agents" | **Agents Skill** (ComposeAgent) | `Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", prompt=<ComposeAgent output>)` | Unique personalities, voices, colors via trait composition |
| "**create an agent team**", "**agent team**", "**swarm**" | **Claude Code Teams** | `TeamCreate` → `TaskCreate` → `SendMessage` | Persistent team with shared task list, message coordination, multi-turn collaboration |
**These are NOT the same thing:**
- **Custom agents** = one-shot parallel workers with unique identities, launched via `Task()`, no shared state
- **Agent teams** = persistent coordinated teams with shared task lists, messaging, and multi-turn collaboration via `TeamCreate`
## When the Algorithm Should Use This Skill
- **3+ independent workstreams** exist at Extended+ effort level
- **Multiple identical non-serial tasks** need parallel execution
- **Specialized expertise** needed (architecture design, implementation, ISC optimization)
- **Large codebase changes** spanning 5+ files benefit from parallel workers
- **Research + execution** can proceed simultaneously
- **"Create an agent team"** — use TeamCreate for persistent coordinated teams
- **Unattended autonomous work where auditability matters more than speed** — spawn an Observer team (Agents skill → SPAWNOBSERVERS) alongside the primary agent, reading the tool-activity audit log, voting continue/halt/escalate. ONLY use when BOTH (a) time is not a constraint and (b) auditability is the primary requirement. Never for interactive or time-sensitive work. See Agents/SKILL.md "Observer Team Archetype" for shape and guardrails.
## Delegation Patterns
### 1. Built-In Agents
**⚠️ Built-in agents are for internal workflow routing ONLY.** When the user asks for custom, specialized, or uniquely-voiced agents, use the Agents skill (section 4 below) instead.
Use `Task(subagent_type="AgentType")` with these specialized agents:
| Agent Type | Specialization | When to Use |
|-----------|---------------|-------------|
| `Engineer` | TDD implementation, code changes | Code-heavy tasks requiring tests |
| `Architect` | System design, structure decisions | Architecture planning, design specs |
| `Algorithm` | ISC optimization, criteria work | ISC-specialized verification |
| `Explore` | Fast codebase search | Quick file/pattern discovery |
| `Plan` | Implementation strategy | Design before execution |
**Always include:** Full context, effort budget, expected output format.
### 2. Worktree-Isolated Agents
Run agents in their own git worktree with `isolation: "worktree"` for file-safe parallelism:
```
Task(subagent_type="Engineer", isolation: "worktree", prompt="...")
```
- Each agent gets its own working tree — no file conflicts with other agents
- Worktree auto-created on spawn, auto-cleaned when agent finishes (unless changes made)
- Use when multiple agents edit the same files or for competing approaches
- Can combine with `run_in_background: true` for non-blocking isolated work
- **Built-in agents with `isolation: worktree` in frontmatter** (Engineer, Architect) auto-isolate on every spawn
### 3. Background Agents
Run agents with `run_in_background: true` for non-blocking parallel work:
```
Task(subagent_type="Engineer", run_in_background: true, prompt="...")
```
- Use when results aren't needed immediately
- Check output with `Read` tool on the output_file path
- Ideal for: research, long builds, parallel investigations
### 3. Foreground Agents
Standard `Task()` calls that block until complete:
- Use when you need the result before proceeding
- Use for sequential dependencies
- Default mode — most common
### 4. Custom Agents (via Agents Skill)
**Trigger:** "custom agents", "spin up agents", "launch agents", "specialized agents"
**Action:** Invoke the **Agents skill** → run `ComposeAgent.ts` → launch with `Task(subagent_type="general-purpose")`
```bash
# Step 1: Compose agent identity
bun run ~/.claude/skills/Agents/Tools/ComposeAgent.ts --traits "security,skeptical,thorough" --task "Review auth" --output json
# Step 2: Launch with composed prompt
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", prompt=<ComposeAgent JSON .prompt field>)
```
- Each agent gets unique personality, voice, and color via ComposeAgent
- Use DIFFERENT trait combinations for each agent to get unique voices
- Never use built-in agent types (Engineer, Architect) for custom work
- Ideal for: domain experts, adversarial reviewers, creative brainstormers, parallel analysis
### 5. Agent Teams (via TeamCreate)
**Trigger:** "create an agent team", "agent team", "swarm", "team of agents"
**Action:** Use `TeamCreate` tool → `TaskCreate` → spawn teammates via `Task(team_name=...)` → coordinate via `SendMessage`
```
1. TeamCreate(team_name="my-project") # Creates team + task list
2. TaskCreate(subject="Implement auth module") # Create team tasks
3. Task(subagent_type="Engineer", team_name="my-project", name="auth-engineer") # Spawn teammate
4. TaskUpdate(taskId="1", owner="auth-engineer") # Assign task
5. SendMessage(type="message", recipient="auth-engineer", content="...") # Coordinate
```
**This is a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT system from custom agents:**
- **Custom agents** (Agents skill) = fire-and-forget parallel workers, no shared state
- **Agent teams** (TeamCreate) = persistent coordinated teams with shared task lists, messaging, multi-turn
**Team Guidelines:**
- Use for 3+ independently workable criteria at Extended+
- Large complex coding tasks benefit most
- Each teammate works independently on assigned tasks via shared task list
- Parent coordinates via `SendMessage`, reconciles results
- Teammates go idle between turns — send messages to wake them
### When to Use Teams vs Subagents (Decision Matrix)
| Factor | Subagents (Task) | Agent Teams (TeamCreate) |
|--------|------------------|--------------------------|
| **Communication** | Fire-and-forget, no peer messaging | Persistent messaging between teammates |
| **Context** | Fresh context each spawn, limited window | Full context window per teammate, preserved across turns |
| **Coordination** | Parent collects results, no shared state | Shared task list, direct peer DMs, idle/wake cycle |
| **Duration** | Single-turn execution | Multi-turn, iterative work with course corrections |
| **Overhead** | Low — spawn and forget | Higher — team setup, task creation, message routing |
| **Best for** | Parallel research, one-shot analysis, simple delegation | Complex multi-file changes, iterative debugging, cross-layer coordination |
**Decision rule:** If agents need to talk to each other or iterate on shared work → Teams. If each agent does independent one-shot work → Subagents.
**Concrete examples:**
- "Research 4 topics in parallel" → **Subagents** (independent, no coordination needed)
- "Build a feature spanning API + UI + tests with shared state" → **Teams** (cross-layer, needs coordination)
- "Run 10 file updates with same pattern" → **Subagents** (parallel, identical, independent)
- "Debug a complex issue with competing hypotheses" → **Teams** (need to share findings, adjust approach)
### 6. Parallel Task Dispatch
For N identical operations (e.g., updating 10 files with the same pattern):
1. Create N `Task()` calls in a single message (parallel launch)
2. Each agent gets one unit of work
3. Results collected when all complete
## Effort-Level Scaling
| Effort | Delegation Strategy |
|--------|-------------------|
| Instant/Fast | No delegation — direct tools only |
| Standard | 1-2 foreground agents max for discrete subtasks |
| Extended | 2-4 agents, background agents for research |
| Advanced | 4-8 agents, agent teams for 3+ workstreams |
| Deep | Full team orchestration, parallel workers |
| Comprehensive | Unbounded — teams + parallel + background |
## Two-Tier Delegation (Lightweight vs Full)
Not all delegation needs a full agent. Match delegation weight to task complexity:
### Lightweight Delegation
**For:** One-shot extraction, classification, summarization, simple Q&A against provided content.
```
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="haiku", max_turns=3, prompt="...")
```
- Use `model="haiku"` for cost/speed efficiency
- Set `max_turns=3` — if it can't finish in 3 turns, it needs full delegation
- Provide all input inline in the prompt (no tool use expected)
- Examples: "Classify this text as X/Y/Z", "Extract the 5 key points from this", "Summarize this in 2 sentences"
### Full Delegation
**For:** Multi-step reasoning, tasks requiring tool use (file reads, searches, web), tasks that need their own iteration loop.
```
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", prompt="...") # or specialized agent type
```
- Default model (sonnet/opus inherited from parent)
- No max_turns restriction — agent iterates until done
- Agent uses tools autonomously (Read, Grep, Bash, etc.)
- Examples: "Research X and produce a report", "Refactor these 5 files", "Debug why test Y fails"
### Decision Rule
**Ask:** "Can this be answered in one LLM call with no tool use?" → Lightweight. Otherwise → Full.
| Signal | Tier |
|--------|------|
| Input fits in prompt, output is extraction/classification | Lightweight |
| Needs to read files, search, or browse | Full |
| Needs iteration or self-correction | Full |
| Simple transform of provided content | Lightweight |
| Requires domain expertise + research | Full |
**Why this matters:** Spawning a full agent for a one-shot extraction wastes ~10-30s of startup overhead and unnecessary context. Lightweight delegation returns in 2-5s. Over an Extended+ Algorithm run with 10+ delegations, this saves minutes. Inspired by RLM's `llm_query()` vs `rlm_query()` two-tier pattern (Zhang/Kraska/Khattab 2025).
## Anti-Patterns (Don't Do These)
- Don't delegate what Grep/Glob/Read can do in <2 seconds
- Don't spawn agents for single-file changes
- Don't create teams for fewer than 3 independent workstreams
- Don't send agents work without full context — they start fresh
- Don't use built-in agent names for custom agents
- Don't use built-in agent types (Designer, Architect, Engineer) when user asks for specialized or custom agents — always use ComposeAgent via the Agents skill
- Don't use full delegation for one-shot extraction/classification — use lightweight tier
## Gotchas
- **Delegation uses Claude Code's built-in TeamCreate** — NOT the Agents skill's ComposeAgent. These are different systems.
- **3+ independent workstreams warrant delegation.** For 1-2 tasks, direct work is faster than team coordination overhead.
- **Agent teams share a task list.** Use TaskCreate/TaskUpdate for coordination, not ad-hoc messages.
- **Teams overkill for single-file tasks.** (Mar 2026 reflection: "one agent that can both read code and write JSX is better than three specialists who can't coordinate")
## Examples
**Example 1: Parallel implementation**
```
User: "build the frontend and backend in parallel"
→ Creates team via TeamCreate
→ Spawns frontend and backend agents
→ Shared task list for coordination
→ Agents work independently, merge results
```
**Example 2: Research swarm**
```
User: "launch an agent team to research these 5 topics"
→ Creates team with 5 research agents
→ Each agent handles one topic independently
→ Results synthesized by team lead
```
## Execution Log
After completing any workflow, append a single JSONL entry:
```bash
echo '{"ts":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'","skill":"Delegation","workflow":"WORKFLOW_USED","input":"8_WORD_SUMMARY","status":"ok|error","duration_s":SECONDS}' >> ~/.claude/PAI/MEMORY/SKILLS/execution.jsonl
```
Replace `WORKFLOW_USED` with the workflow executed, `8_WORD_SUMMARY` with a brief input description, and `SECONDS` with approximate wall-clock time. Log `status: "error"` if the workflow failed.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!