Skip to content
Back to skills

Intent Framed Agent

ASecurity

Frames coding-agent work sessions with explicit intent capture and drift monitoring. Use when a session transitions from planning/Q&A to implementation for coding tasks, refactors, feature builds, bug fixes, or other multi-step execution where scope drift is a risk.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 11, 2026
ai-agentsgobashrailsgitapisecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned November 11, 2026

npx -y skills add YYC-Cube/YYC3-AI-Agent-Archive --skill intent-framed-agent --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Intent Framed Agent?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Intent Framed Agent
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yyc-cube-intent-framed-agent/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yyc-cube-intent-framed-agent)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: intent-framed-agent
description: "Frames coding-agent work sessions with explicit intent capture and drift monitoring. Use when a session transitions from planning/Q&A to implementation for coding tasks, refactors, feature builds, bug fixes, or other multi-step execution where scope drift is a risk."
---

# Intent Framed Agent

## Install

```bash
npx skills add pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills
```

```bash
npx skills add pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills/skills/intent-framed-agent
```

## Purpose

This skill turns implicit intent into an explicit, trackable artifact at the
moment execution starts. It creates a lightweight intent contract, watches for
scope drift while work is in progress, and closes each intent with a short
resolution record.

## Scope (Important)

Use this skill for coding tasks only. It is designed for implementation work
that changes executable code.

Do not use it for general-agent activities such as:
- broad research
- planning-only conversations
- documentation-only work
- operational/admin tasks with no coding implementation

For trivial edits (for example, simple renames or typo fixes), skip the full
intent frame.

## Trigger

Activate at the planning-to-execution transition for non-trivial coding work.

Common cues:
- User says: "go ahead", "implement this", "let's start building"
- Agent is about to move from discussion into code changes

## Workflow

### Phase 1: Intent Capture

At execution start, emit:

```markdown
## Intent Frame #N

**Outcome:** [One sentence. What does done look like?]
**Approach:** [How we will implement it. Key decisions.]
**Constraints:** [Out-of-scope boundaries.]
**Success criteria:** [How we verify completion.]
**Estimated complexity:** [Small / Medium / Large]
```

Rules:
- Keep each field to 1-2 sentences.
- Ask for confirmation before coding:
  - `Does this capture what we are doing? Anything to adjust before I start?`
- Do not proceed until the user confirms or adjusts.

### Phase 2: Intent Monitor

During execution, monitor for drift at natural boundaries:
- before touching a new area/file
- before starting a new logical work unit
- when current action feels tangential

Drift examples:
- work outside stated scope
- approach changes with no explicit pivot
- new features/refactors outside constraints
- solving a different problem than the stated outcome

When detected, emit:

```markdown
## Intent Check #N

This looks like it may be moving outside the stated intent.

**Stated outcome:** [From active frame]
**Current action:** [What is happening]
**Question:** Is this a deliberate pivot or accidental scope creep?
```

If pivot is intentional, update the active intent frame and continue. If not,
return to the original scope.

### Phase 3: Intent Resolution

When work under the active intent ends, emit:

```markdown
## Intent Resolution #N

**Outcome:** [Fulfilled / Partially fulfilled / Pivoted / Abandoned]
**What was delivered:** [Brief actual output]
**Pivots:** [Any acknowledged changes, or None]
**Open items:** [Remaining in-scope items, or None]
```

Resolution is preferred but optional if the session ends abruptly.

## Multi-Intent Sessions

One session can contain multiple intent frames.

Rules:
1. Resolve current intent before opening the next.
2. If user changes direction mid-task, resolve current intent as
   `Abandoned` or `Pivoted`, then open a new frame.
3. Drift checks always target the currently active frame.
4. Number frames sequentially within the session (`#1`, `#2`, ...).
5. Constraints do not carry forward unless explicitly restated.

## Entire CLI Integration

Entire CLI: https://github.com/entireio/cli

When tool access is available, detect Entire at activation:

```bash
entire status 2>/dev/null
```

- If it succeeds, mention that intent records will be captured in the session
  transcript on the checkpoint branch.
- If unavailable/failing, continue silently. Do not block execution and do not
  nag about installation.

Copilot/chat fallback:
- If command execution is unavailable, skip detection and continue with the
  same intent workflow in chat output.

## Guardrails

- Keep it lightweight; avoid long prose.
- Do not over-trigger on trivial tasks.
- Do not interrupt on every small step.
- Treat acknowledged pivots as valid.
- Preserve exact structured block headers/fields for parseability.

## Interoperability with Other Skills

Use this skill as the front-door alignment layer for non-trivial coding work:
1. `plan-interview` (optional, for requirement shaping)
2. `intent-framed-agent` (execution contract + scope drift monitoring)
3. `context-surfing` (context quality monitoring — runs concurrently with intent-framed-agent during execution)
4. `simplify-and-harden` (post-completion quality/security pass)
5. `self-improvement` (capture recurring patterns and promote durable rules)

### Relationship with context-surfing

Both skills are live during execution. They monitor different failure modes:

- **intent-framed-agent** monitors *scope* drift — is the agent doing the right
  thing? It fires structured Intent Checks when work moves outside the stated
  outcome.
- **context-surfing** monitors *context quality* drift — is the agent still
  capable of doing it well? It fires when the agent's own coherence degrades
  (hallucination, contradiction, hedging).

They are complementary, not redundant. An agent can be perfectly on-scope while
its context quality degrades. Conversely, scope drift can happen with perfect
context quality. Intent Checks continue firing alongside context-surfing's wave
monitoring.

**Precedence rule:** If both skills fire simultaneously (an Intent Check and a
context-surfing drift exit at the same time), the drift exit takes precedence.
Degraded context makes scope checks unreliable — resolve the context issue
first, then resume scope monitoring in the next session.

### What this skill produces

- **Intent frame artifact** — consumed by context-surfing as part of the wave
  anchor and copied verbatim into handoff files on drift exit.
- **Intent resolution** — signals task completion, which triggers
  simplify-and-harden.
- **Drift observations** — scope drift patterns can be logged to
  self-improvement as learnings if they recur.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

View all in ai-agents →

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.