Orchestration plan for a five-stage long-form content pipeline (raw capture → theme extraction → research → draft → quality gate and fan-out). Defines each stage's input, output, success criteria, and retry rules so a content-marketer agent can chain the existing writing, research, and distribution skills deterministically. Use when user asks about content pipeline, production workflow, blog production line, multichannel fan-out, editorial workflow, 콘텐츠 파이프라인, 장문 워크플로, 블로그 제작 라인, or 멀티채널 확산.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Yoodaddy0311/artibot --skill content-pipeline --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Content Pipeline?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yoodaddy0311-content-pipeline)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
context: fork
name: content-pipeline
description: "Orchestration plan for a five-stage long-form content pipeline (raw capture → theme extraction → research → draft → quality gate and fan-out). Defines each stage's input, output, success criteria, and retry rules so a content-marketer agent can chain the existing writing, research, and distribution skills deterministically. Use when user asks about content pipeline, production workflow, blog production line, multichannel fan-out, editorial workflow, 콘텐츠 파이프라인, 장문 워크플로, 블로그 제작 라인, or 멀티채널 확산."
platforms: [claude-code, gemini-cli, codex-cli, cursor]
level: 4
triggers:
- "content pipeline"
- "content production"
- "editorial workflow"
- "blog production"
- "long-form workflow"
- "multichannel fan-out"
- "content orchestration"
- "publish pipeline"
- "콘텐츠 파이프라인"
- "장문 워크플로"
- "블로그 제작 라인"
- "편집 워크플로"
- "멀티채널 확산"
agents:
- "content-marketer"
- "long-form-writer"
tokens: "~5K"
category: "marketing"
---
# Content Pipeline
## When This Skill Applies
- Producing a long-form article that must ship across blog, newsletter, LinkedIn, and Twitter from one source
- Coordinating research, drafting, and fan-out when more than one writing skill is in play
- Any brief where the user supplies raw notes and expects publish-ready assets at the end
- Retrofitting an existing draft into the five-stage flow because quality drifted
- Any request that mentions "end-to-end", "full workflow", "pipeline", or "production line" for content
This skill is a plan, not an executor. The content-marketer or long-form-writer agent runs each stage using the skills listed in the Stage Table.
## Core Guidance
### 1. Stage Table
| Stage | Name | Input | Output File | Success Criteria | Owning Skills |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raw capture | User notes, references, brief | rawnotes.md | Topic, audience, purpose, target length all stated | — |
| 2 | Theme extraction | rawnotes.md | theme-brief.md | One angle, one hypothesis, one audience persona | marketing-strategy, seo-strategy |
| 3 | Research | theme-brief.md | research-brief.md | 8+ sources with URLs, each cite-ready, date-stamped | market-research, technical-seo, aeo-geo-2026 |
| 4 | Long-form draft | research-brief.md | draft.md | All rules of the chosen type skill followed in full | long-form-writing or case-study or column-editorial or thought-leadership or interview-storytelling |
| 5 | Quality gate + fan-out | draft.md | publish-ready.md + variants/*.md | Rubric score 90+, N platform variants emitted | ai-slop-reviewer, long-form-quality-rubric, social-media, email-marketing |
The pipeline is sequential by default. Parallelism is allowed only where the Branch Logic section explicitly permits it.
### 2. Stage 1 — Raw Capture
| Field | Specification |
|---|---|
| Purpose | Freeze the input so later stages have a stable source of truth |
| Required fields | topic, target audience, purpose of the piece, target word count, deadline if any, draft type |
| Output location | `content/<slug>/rawnotes.md` |
| Failure mode | Any required field blank → stop and ask the user, do not synthesize |
| Retry rule | Never retry silently; a missing field fails the whole pipeline |
The agent does not write prose in this stage. It only records what the user supplied verbatim and flags gaps.
### 3. Stage 2 — Theme Extraction
| Field | Specification |
|---|---|
| Input | rawnotes.md from Stage 1 |
| Output | theme-brief.md with angle, hypothesis, persona, forbidden topics |
| Success | Exactly one angle (not a menu), hypothesis phrased as a claim, persona named with role and pain |
| Skills applied | marketing-strategy for positioning, seo-strategy for query intent |
| Retry rule | If angle splits into 2+, force the agent to pick one and log the discards in the brief |
| Skip condition | User supplied a finished theme brief → skip this stage and label it `skipped:user-provided` |
Angle drift is the most common failure. The agent must quote the exact angle sentence in every later stage's preamble so the draft cannot wander.
### 4. Stage 3 — Research
| Field | Specification |
|---|---|
| Input | theme-brief.md |
| Output | research-brief.md with 8+ cited facts |
| Source format | `[claim] — [source name, year] — [URL] — [verified:yes/no]` |
| Success | 8+ sources, every URL resolves, no source dated older than 36 months unless it is a primary canonical reference |
| Skills applied | market-research for competitive context, technical-seo for query landscape, aeo-geo-2026 for citability angles |
| Retry rule | Fewer than 8 sources → extend the research pass once; still short → downgrade target word count proportionally rather than pad |
| Skip condition | Rarely; only when the piece is an opinion column with a declared evidence-light posture |
Stages 2 and 3 may be merged into one pass when the brief is under 1,000 words and the angle is obvious. This merge must be logged as `merged:stage-2-3` in the brief.
### 5. Stage 4 — Long-Form Draft
| Field | Specification |
|---|---|
| Input | research-brief.md |
| Output | draft.md written end-to-end |
| Type selection | Pick exactly one: long-form-writing, case-study, column-editorial, thought-leadership, interview-storytelling |
| Success | Every hard rule in the chosen skill met (answer-first lead, citable passages, H2 ratio, sentence discipline, etc.) |
| Retry rule | Drift from the Stage 2 angle → restart the draft, do not patch |
| Skip condition | Never skipped |
Type selection is made once and logged. Switching type mid-draft is an anti-pattern; it forces a Stage 4 restart.
### 6. Stage 4.5 — Voice Drift Check
This is an integration point, not a full stage. Before the quality gate, the agent runs ai-slop-reviewer with voice-reference loaded. Drift output is triaged:
| Drift Level | Action |
|---|---|
| 0-5% from voice reference | Proceed to Stage 5 |
| 6-15% | Minor rewrite pass, stay in Stage 4 |
| 16-30% | Major rewrite, restart Stage 4 |
| 31%+ | Restart from Stage 2; the angle itself is likely off-voice |
### 7. Stage 5 — Quality Gate and Fan-Out
Quality gate runs first. Fan-out runs only if the gate passes.
| Rubric Score | Verdict | Next Action |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | Publish-ready | Proceed to fan-out |
| 75-89 | Minor edits | Return to Stage 4 with specific edit notes; one revision pass allowed |
| 60-74 | Major rewrite | Restart Stage 4 from the same research brief |
| < 60 | Reject | Restart from Stage 2; the premise is broken |
Fan-out produces one file per channel under `content/<slug>/variants/`. The source of truth stays `publish-ready.md`; variants are derivatives and must link back.
### 8. Fan-Out Matrix
| Channel | Derived From | Skill | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn long-form | Full draft | social-media | 1,200-1,800 word post with native formatting |
| Twitter/X thread | Citable passages | social-media | 6-10 tweet thread, one idea per tweet |
| Newsletter | Answer-first lead + top 2 citable passages | email-marketing | 400-600 word email with subject A/B |
| Podcast Q&A outline | Question H2s | — | Host prompt list with timestamps target |
| SEO meta + schema | Title, meta, FAQ H2s | aeo-geo-2026 + technical-seo | meta.json with title, description, FAQ schema |
N variants is brief-specific. Minimum default: LinkedIn + Twitter + newsletter. Podcast and schema are optional unless the brief asks.
### 9. Branch Logic
| Condition | Branch |
|---|---|
| User supplies theme brief already | Skip Stage 2, label `skipped:user-provided` |
| Piece under 1,000 words and angle obvious | Merge Stages 2 and 3, label `merged:stage-2-3` |
| Opinion column with declared evidence-light posture | Stage 3 minimum drops to 3 sources; type must be column-editorial |
| Interview feature | Stage 3 shifts from market research to transcript clean-up; type is interview-storytelling |
| Fan-out disabled by brief | Stage 5 runs quality gate only; no variants emitted |
### 10. Output Contract
Each pipeline run produces this directory layout. The agent must create every file listed unless a Branch Logic rule excuses it.
```
content/<slug>/
├── rawnotes.md
├── theme-brief.md
├── research-brief.md
├── draft.md
├── publish-ready.md
├── quality-report.md
└── variants/
├── linkedin.md
├── twitter-thread.md
├── newsletter.md
├── meta.json
└── podcast-outline.md (optional)
```
## Output Format
```
PIPELINE RUN
============
Slug: [content slug]
Draft type: [long-form-writing | case-study | column-editorial | thought-leadership | interview-storytelling]
Angle: [one sentence, quoted from theme-brief.md]
Audience: [persona name and role]
STAGE LEDGER
────────────
| # | Stage | Status | Artifact |
|---|--------------------|---------------------|--------------------------|
| 1 | Raw capture | done | rawnotes.md |
| 2 | Theme extraction | done | theme-brief.md |
| 3 | Research | done | research-brief.md |
| 4 | Draft | done | draft.md |
| 4.5 | Voice drift | [pct]% drift | — |
| 5 | Quality + fan-out | [rubric score] | publish-ready.md + N var |
FAN-OUT
───────
| Channel | File | Status |
|-----------|------------------------------|--------|
| LinkedIn | variants/linkedin.md | done |
| Twitter | variants/twitter-thread.md | done |
| Newsletter| variants/newsletter.md | done |
| Meta | variants/meta.json | done |
```
## Quick Reference
**Stages**: raw capture → theme extraction → research → draft → quality + fan-out
**Sequential by default**: parallelism only where Branch Logic allows
**Quality bar**: 90+ rubric for publish-ready; below that, specific retry rules apply
**Voice drift triage**: 0-5 pass, 6-15 minor, 16-30 major, 31+ restart from Stage 2
**Minimum fan-out**: LinkedIn + Twitter + newsletter
**Source of truth**: publish-ready.md; variants are derivatives and link back
## Anti-Patterns
- Do NOT skip a stage without logging the Branch Logic rule that permits it
- Do NOT run Stages 2 through 4 in parallel; angle drift compounds across stages
- Do NOT fan out before the rubric score clears 90
- Do NOT patch a draft that failed Stage 4.5 with 16%+ drift; restart the draft
- Do NOT switch draft type mid-Stage-4; that is a Stage 4 restart, not an edit
- Do NOT pad a short research brief to hit 8 sources; downgrade word count instead
- Do NOT treat variants as the canonical output; publish-ready.md is the source
---
## References
- See `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/pipeline-stages.md` for per-stage checklists and file format contracts
- See `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../long-form-writing/SKILL.md` for Stage 4 long-form rules
- See `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../ai-slop-reviewer/SKILL.md` for Stage 4.5 drift scoring
- See `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../social-media/SKILL.md` and `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../email-marketing/SKILL.md` for Stage 5 fan-out
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!