Skip to content
Back to skills

Winner Stress Testing

ASecurity

Stress-test the winning candidate using Pre-mortem, Red Teaming, and Failure Mode Analysis to expose hidden weaknesses before commitment.

  • 417 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
researchgotesting

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill winner-stress-testing --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Winner Stress Testing?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Winner Stress Testing
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yogsoth-ai-winner-stress-testing/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-winner-stress-testing)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: winner-stress-testing
description: Stress-test the winning candidate using Pre-mortem, Red Teaming, and Failure Mode Analysis to expose hidden weaknesses before commitment.
used-by: steel-manning
---

# Winner Stress-Testing

**Purpose:** Subject the convergence winner to rigorous adversarial pressure, identifying failure modes, hidden assumptions, and boundary conditions that could cause the decision to fail in practice.

**When to use:**
- After a winner has been selected but before final commitment
- When the decision carries high stakes or irreversibility
- When the winner was selected by narrow margin
- When implementation risk is uncertain

## Budget

| Metric | Minimum |
|--------|---------|
| Attack angles | >= 3 distinct failure vectors |
| Assumptions challenged | >= 5 |
| Pre-mortem scenarios | >= 3 |
| Severity threshold | All HIGH severity findings must be addressed |

## State Ledger

```yaml
winner: <candidate>
attack_vectors_applied: []
assumptions_found: []
failure_modes: []
severity_ratings: {}
verdict: null  # ACCEPT | REJECT | REVISE
conditions_for_acceptance: []
```

## Available Tactics

| Tactic | When to Deploy |
|--------|---------------|
| assumption-excavation | Default — extract and challenge winner's assumptions |
| adversarial-debate-protocol | When specific weaknesses need formal debate |
| multi-perspective-attack | When winner affects multiple stakeholder groups |

## Available SOPs

- assumption-extraction — surface hidden assumptions in the winner
- assumption-challenge — attack each assumption
- conclusion-sensitivity — map which assumptions are load-bearing
- critic-attack — direct attack on winner's case
- judge-verdict — render accept/reject/revise

## Execution Guidance

1. Deploy assumption-excavation to surface and challenge assumptions
2. Identify critical assumptions from sensitivity map
3. For each critical assumption, assess mitigation feasibility
4. If >= 1 unmitigable critical assumption, verdict is REVISE or REJECT
5. Record all findings in Challenge Ledger

## Output Format

```yaml
strategy: winner-stress-testing
winner: <candidate>
assumptions_found: <count>
critical_assumptions: <count>
failure_modes:
  - mode: <description>
    severity: HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
    mitigable: true | false
verdict: ACCEPT | REJECT | REVISE
conditions: []
recommended_modifications: []
```

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.