Skip to content
Back to skills

Weight Elicitation

ASecurity

Determine criteria weights using AHP, Swing, BWM, MACBETH, or Simos methods.

  • 417 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
research

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill weight-elicitation --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Weight Elicitation?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Weight Elicitation
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yogsoth-ai-weight-elicitation/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-weight-elicitation)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: weight-elicitation
description: Determine criteria weights using AHP, Swing, BWM, MACBETH, or Simos methods.
used-by: multi-criteria-scoring
---

# Weight Elicitation

**Purpose:** Determine relative weights for evaluation criteria through structured methods, supporting AHP, Swing, BWM, MACBETH, Simos, and other weighting methods.

**When to use:**
- Need to determine criteria importance ranking and quantified weights
- Multiple stakeholders disagree on weights
- Need to compare result differences across weighting methods

## Budget

| Base SOP | Target | ±10% Range |
|----------|--------|------------|
| criterion-definition | 5-8 criteria | 4-9 |
| weight-elicitation-sop | ≥2 methods | 2-3 |
| rank-comparison | 1 comparison | 1 |

## State Ledger

```yaml
strategy: weight-elicitation
status: pending
criteria_defined: false
method_1: null
method_2: null
weights_1: []
weights_2: []
compared: false
final_weights: []
```

## Available Tactics

- **multi-method-triangulation** — Multi-method comparison to ensure weight robustness

## Available SOPs

### Import
- criterion-definition
- weight-elicitation-sop
- rank-comparison

### Subagent
- method-sensitivity-report

## Execution Guidance

1. Invoke criterion-definition to confirm criteria to be weighted
2. Select >=2 weighting methods (recommended: AHP + BWM or Swing + Simos)
3. Invoke weight-elicitation-sop separately for each method to compute weights
4. Invoke rank-comparison to compare weight ranking consistency
5. If significant differences exist, analyze causes and select the most suitable method for the scenario
6. Output final weight vector

## Output Format

```markdown
## Weight Determination Results

### Weight Comparison
| Criterion | AHP Weight | BWM Weight | Average | Difference |
|-----------|------------|------------|---------|------------|

### Consistency Check
- AHP CR: [value] (< 0.1 ✓)
- BWM ξ*: [value]

### Final Weights
| Criterion | Weight | Rank |
|-----------|--------|------|

### Method Selection Rationale
[Why the chosen method's weights are used as the final result]
```

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.