Determine criteria weights using AHP, Swing, BWM, MACBETH, or Simos methods.
Scanned 5/27/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine---
name: weight-elicitation
description: Determine criteria weights using AHP, Swing, BWM, MACBETH, or Simos methods.
used-by: multi-criteria-scoring
---
# Weight Elicitation
**Purpose:** Determine relative weights for evaluation criteria through structured methods, supporting AHP, Swing, BWM, MACBETH, Simos, and other weighting methods.
**When to use:**
- Need to determine criteria importance ranking and quantified weights
- Multiple stakeholders disagree on weights
- Need to compare result differences across weighting methods
## Budget
| Base SOP | Target | ±10% Range |
|----------|--------|------------|
| criterion-definition | 5-8 criteria | 4-9 |
| weight-elicitation-sop | ≥2 methods | 2-3 |
| rank-comparison | 1 comparison | 1 |
## State Ledger
```yaml
strategy: weight-elicitation
status: pending
criteria_defined: false
method_1: null
method_2: null
weights_1: []
weights_2: []
compared: false
final_weights: []
```
## Available Tactics
- **multi-method-triangulation** — Multi-method comparison to ensure weight robustness
## Available SOPs
### Import
- criterion-definition
- weight-elicitation-sop
- rank-comparison
### Subagent
- method-sensitivity-report
## Execution Guidance
1. Invoke criterion-definition to confirm criteria to be weighted
2. Select >=2 weighting methods (recommended: AHP + BWM or Swing + Simos)
3. Invoke weight-elicitation-sop separately for each method to compute weights
4. Invoke rank-comparison to compare weight ranking consistency
5. If significant differences exist, analyze causes and select the most suitable method for the scenario
6. Output final weight vector
## Output Format
```markdown
## Weight Determination Results
### Weight Comparison
| Criterion | AHP Weight | BWM Weight | Average | Difference |
|-----------|------------|------------|---------|------------|
### Consistency Check
- AHP CR: [value] (< 0.1 ✓)
- BWM ξ*: [value]
### Final Weights
| Criterion | Weight | Rank |
|-----------|--------|------|
### Method Selection Rationale
[Why the chosen method's weights are used as the final result]
```
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...
Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...
Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API