Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Type Relation

ASecurity

Classify relations among entities using an explicit relation ontology and state evidence/assumptions for the type.

499 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/24/2026
research

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/24/2026

$npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill type-relation --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Type Relation?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Type Relation
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yogsoth-ai-type-relation/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-type-relation)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: type-relation
description: "Classify relations among entities using an explicit relation ontology and state evidence/assumptions for the type."
---

# type-relation
## Purpose
Classify relations among entities with an explicit relation ontology and evidence for the chosen type.
## Input contract
```yaml
required: [entity_pair, relation_ontology, evidence_register]
optional: [candidate_relation_types, scope_ledger, prior_edges]
constraints: [relation type, direction, scope, and evidence are explicit]
```
## Procedure
1. Verify that both entities are in scope and normalize their identifiers.
2. Enumerate candidate relation types and test each against its defining conditions.
3. Select the best-supported type or record ambiguity, then state direction and evidence.
4. Emit the typed relation, rejected types, and follow-up evidence needed to resolve uncertainty.

If typed relations include stable broader-narrower or part-whole structure, consider `construct-hierarchy` as the next tactic.

## Output contract
```yaml
produces: [typed_relation, rejected_relation_types, evidence_links, unresolved_relation_questions]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
```
## Quality gates
- Each relation has a type definition, direction, entity pair, and at least one evidence link or explicit unknown status.
- Do not assign a hierarchical relation when the evidence only supports co-occurrence.
## Failure and counterexamples
Do not infer relation type from entity names. If multiple relation types remain plausible, preserve the alternatives.
## Provenance map
- resolved: relation-typing
- resolved: edge-batch-creation

Attribution

yogsoth-aiyogsoth-ai
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from yogsoth-ai →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report co...

502942 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

953191 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end p...

502941 votes

Last30days 2

Research any topic across Reddit, X/Twitter, and the web from the last 30 days. Synthesizes findings into actionable insights or copy-paste prompts.

6511 votes
View all in research →