Strategy: Williamson-style precise thought experiments — construct carefully specified counterfactual scenarios to test whether conclusions depend on contingent features.
Scanned 5/27/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine---
name: thought-experiment
description: "Strategy: Williamson-style precise thought experiments — construct carefully specified counterfactual scenarios to test whether conclusions depend on contingent features."
type: strategy
used-by: [counterfactual-probing]
tactics: [minimal-change-search, causal-necessity-testing]
---
# Thought Experiment Strategy
Williamson methodology: construct precise, well-specified counterfactual scenarios that isolate individual variables.
## Method
1. **causal-claim-extraction** identifies the conclusion and its dependencies
2. **factor-enumeration** identifies contingent vs. essential features
3. **counterfactual-scenario-construction** builds precise thought experiments
4. **flip-point-detection** identifies which scenario variations flip the conclusion
5. **necessity-evaluation** determines if flipped factors are genuinely necessary
6. **load-bearing-identification** distinguishes essential from contingent support
## Design Principles
- Scenarios must be internally consistent (no impossible worlds)
- Changes must be minimal and precisely specified
- Background conditions must be held fixed except the target variable
- Conclusions must follow from the scenario, not from intuition pumps
## Budget Table
| Parameter | S | M | L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thought experiments | 3 | 8 | 15 |
| Variables isolated | 3 | 6 | 12 |
| Scenario precision checks | 1 | 3 | 6 |
## Orchestration
```
causal-claim-extraction → factor-enumeration
→ [for each contingent feature]:
counterfactual-scenario-construction (precise scenario)
→ flip-point-detection (does conclusion hold?)
→ necessity-evaluation (is this genuinely necessary?)
→ load-bearing-identification (essential vs contingent)
```
## Subagents
- causal-claim-extraction (dependency identification)
- factor-enumeration (contingent feature detection)
- counterfactual-scenario-construction (scenario design)
- flip-point-detection (conclusion testing)
- necessity-evaluation (necessity judgment)
- load-bearing-identification (classification)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...
Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...
Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API