Skip to content
Back to skills

Scope Assessment

ASecurity

SOP: 评估研究问题的范围是否合适(太宽/合适/太窄)

  • 417 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
researchgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill scope-assessment --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Scope Assessment?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Scope Assessment
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yogsoth-ai-scope-assessment/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-scope-assessment)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: scope-assessment
description: "SOP: 评估研究问题的范围是否合适(太宽/合适/太窄)"
version: 1.0.0
category: hypothesis-formation
type: sop
campaign: research-question
input: "研究问题(RQ)"
output: "范围判定 + 调整建议"
dependencies:
  skills:
    - subagent-spawning
---

# Scope Assessment

评估研究问题的范围 — 判断太宽、合适、还是太窄,并给出调整建议。

## HARD-GATE

<HARD-GATE>
输入必须包含: 至少 1 个完整表述的研究问题。
</HARD-GATE>

## Pipeline

1. **前置检查**: RQ 是否为完整句子
2. **维度分析**: 识别 RQ 中的限定维度(时间/地点/人群/方法/现象)
3. **可回答性判断**: 这个问题需要多大规模的研究来回答?
4. **范围判定**: 太宽 / 合适 / 太窄
5. **调整建议**: 如果不合适,建议具体调整方向
6. **输出**: 判定结果 + 理由 + 调整建议

## Judgment Criteria

- **太宽**: 需要一本书 / 多篇论文 / 无法设计单一实验
- **合适**: 一篇论文可以回答 / 可以设计明确的研究方案
- **太窄**: 答案显而易见 / 缺乏理论贡献 / trivial

## Output Format

```
Scope: TOO_BROAD / APPROPRIATE / TOO_NARROW
Rationale: [一句话理由]
Dimensions: [当前限定维度列表]
Suggestion: [调整方向] (only if not APPROPRIATE)
```

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md1.3 KB
  • prompt.md947 B

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.