Design experiments to identify failure boundaries and robustness limits
Scanned 5/27/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine---
name: robustness-design
description: "Design experiments to identify failure boundaries and robustness limits"
version: 1.0.0
category: experiment-execution
type: strategy
used-by: experiment-design
sops:
- factor-identification
- level-specification
- baseline-selection
- metric-specification
- sample-size-estimation
- design-matrix-construction
tactics:
- statistical-method-selection
---
# Strategy: Robustness Design
**Question**: Under what conditions does the method fail?
## Methodology
- **Distribution Shift Testing**: Evaluate under covariate shift, label shift, domain shift.
- **Adversarial Robustness**: Perturbation-based attacks (PGD, AutoAttack) at varying epsilon.
- **Cross-Domain Transfer**: Test on domains not seen during training.
- **Noise Injection**: Gaussian noise, label noise, missing data at varying severity.
- **Stress Testing**: Push inputs to boundary conditions (extreme lengths, rare categories, edge cases).
## Execution Flow
1. **factor-identification** → Identify robustness dimensions (noise type, shift type, severity)
2. **level-specification** → Define severity levels for each perturbation
3. **baseline-selection** → Select robust baselines for comparison
4. **metric-specification** → Define degradation metrics (absolute and relative to clean)
5. **design-matrix-construction** → Build perturbation grid
6. **sample-size-estimation** → Determine samples needed per condition
7. **statistical-method-selection** (tactic) → Choose tests for degradation significance
## Budget Gate
| Robustness Type | Conditions | Severities | Min Runs | Notes |
|----------------|-----------|-----------|----------|-------|
| Single perturbation | 1 | 3-5 | 3-5 | Quick sanity check |
| Multi-perturbation | 3-5 | 3 each | 9-15 | Standard robustness eval |
| Adversarial sweep | 1 attack | 5-10 epsilon | 5-10 | Adversarial robustness curve |
| Comprehensive | 5+ types | 3-5 each | 50+ | Publication-ready robustness |
| Cross-domain | N domains | 1 | N | Transfer evaluation |
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...
Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...
Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API