Are resources sufficient? — Quantify compute, data, time, human, and financial resource constraints
Scanned 5/27/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine---
name: resource-constraint
description: "Are resources sufficient? — Quantify compute, data, time, human, and financial resource constraints"
version: 1.0.0
category: experiment-execution
type: strategy
used-by: constraint-analysis
sops:
- resource-quantification
- critical-chain-identification
- buffer-sizing
tactics:
- sensitivity-ranking
---
# Strategy: Resource Constraint
## Methodology
Systematic resource feasibility assessment:
- **Demand modeling**: What does the experiment need?
- **Supply inventory**: What do we actually have?
- **Gap analysis**: Where does demand exceed supply?
- **Critical chain**: Which resource constraints lie on the critical path?
- **Buffer sizing**: How much slack do we need?
Resource categories:
| Category | Examples |
|----------|----------|
| Compute | GPU hours, CPU cores, memory, storage |
| Data | Training samples, labeled data, access rights |
| Time | Calendar time, researcher hours, review cycles |
| Human | Expertise, headcount, availability |
| Financial | Budget, cost per experiment, opportunity cost |
## Execution Flow
1. **Quantify Resources** → call `resource-quantification` SOP
- Input: experiment plan, resource inventory
- Output: demand/supply/gap table per category
2. **Identify Critical Chain** → call `critical-chain-identification` SOP
- Input: task list with resource assignments
- Output: critical chain with resource contention points
3. **Size Buffers** → call `buffer-sizing` SOP
- Input: critical chain, task duration estimates
- Output: project/feeding/resource buffer recommendations
4. **Rank Sensitivity** → invoke `sensitivity-ranking` tactic
- Determine which resource gap is most binding
5. **Report** → synthesize feasibility assessment
- Go/No-Go/Conditional recommendation
## Budget Gate
| Resource | Budget | Notes |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Subagent calls | ≤6 | 3 SOPs + synthesis |
| Iterations | ≤2 | Re-quantify if estimates change |
| Output size | ≤3000 tokens | Gap table + recommendation |
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...
Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...
Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API