Negate claims, derive consequences, search contradictions/counterexamples, then refine scope rather than merely defend the original wording.
Scanned 9/24/2026
npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill reductio-counterexample-analysis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Reductio Counterexample Analysis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-reductio-counterexample-analysis)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: reductio-counterexample-analysis
description: "Negate claims, derive consequences, search contradictions/counterexamples, then refine scope rather than merely defend the original wording."
---
# reductio-counterexample-analysis
## Purpose
Negate claims, derive consequences, detect contradictions and counterexamples, then refine scope.
## Input contract
```yaml
required: [claim, scope, supporting_reasoning]
optional: [known_counterexamples, boundary_conditions]
constraints: [negation must preserve the stated scope]
```
## Execution protocol
Do not perform called SOP operations inline; each loaded SOP owns its contract and thresholds.
1. You MUST load skill `negate-claim` to negate the claim. You MUST load skill `derive-consequences` to derive the consequences.
2. You MUST load skill `detect-contradiction` to detect contradictions. You MUST load skill `generate-counterexample` to generate counterexamples.
3. You MUST load skill `refine-claim` to refine the claim without deleting surviving evidence.
If the surviving claim needs an explicit region of validity, consider `map-validity-envelope` as the next tactic.
Deviation: if negation is outside the claim scope, mark it out-of-scope rather than a failure.
## Output contract
```yaml
produces: [negated_claim, consequence_chain, contradiction_report, counterexamples, refined_claim]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions]
```
## Thresholds and quality gates
- Counterexamples must satisfy the original stated scope.
- Refinement must identify which commitment was narrowed.
## Failure and counterexamples
Do not use a counterexample that violates the claim's declared boundary.
## Provenance map
- resolved: assumption-negation
- resolved: contradiction-derivation
- resolved: monster-barring-attempt
- resolved: claim-refinement
## Preserved source criteria ledger
| source | source line | kind | source criterion |
|---|---:|---|---|
| v4 architecture | node desc | textual | Negate, derive, detect contradiction/counterexample, refine scope. |
## Context checkpoint / Delta notes
Append negation, consequences, counterexamples, and scope revision.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!