Back to skills
SKILL.md
Red Teaming
ASecurityCampaign: Systematic adversarial attack from military/intelligence/AI-safety traditions. Core question: Can systematic adversarial attacks find fatal flaws? Methods: UFMCS Red Team Handbook v9.0, CIA SAT, Anthropic Red Teaming, NIST AI RMF, Inie et al. 12-strategy taxonomy.
- 417 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 8 views
- Added May 27, 2026
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill red-teaming --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Red Teaming?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-red-teaming)---
name: red-teaming
description: "Campaign: Systematic adversarial attack from military/intelligence/AI-safety traditions. Core question: Can systematic adversarial attacks find fatal flaws? Methods: UFMCS Red Team Handbook v9.0, CIA SAT, Anthropic Red Teaming, NIST AI RMF, Inie et al. 12-strategy taxonomy."
type: campaign
produces: RedTeamReport
artifact-types: [gap, hypothesis, research-question, idea, approach, experiment-design, claim]
---
# Red Teaming Campaign
Core question: **Can systematic adversarial attacks find fatal flaws in this artifact?**
## Methodology Sources
- UFMCS Red Team Handbook v9.0 — Military structured analytic techniques
- CIA Structured Analytic Techniques (SAT) — Key Assumptions Check, Devil's Advocacy
- Anthropic Red Teaming (2022) — AI-safety systematic probing methodology
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework — Threat surface enumeration
- Inie et al. (2024) — 12-strategy taxonomy of adversarial attacks
## Strategy Routing
| Artifact Type | Primary Strategy | Fallback Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| hypothesis, claim | assumption-challenge | adversarial-persona |
| research-question | alternative-analysis | groupthink-mitigation |
| idea, approach | systematic-probing | assumption-challenge |
| experiment-design | systematic-probing | alternative-analysis |
| gap | adversarial-persona | groupthink-mitigation |
## Budget Table
| Parameter | S (Quick) | M (Standard) | L (Deep) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attack vectors | 5 | 12 | 20 |
| Probing rounds | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| Personas | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Assumption checks | 5 | 10 | 20 |
## Tactics
- **structured-attack-campaign** — Threat surface enumeration, vector generation, systematic probing, aggregation
- **assumption-cascade** — Surface assumptions, dependency sort, root attack, cascade trace
- **adversarial-roleplay** — Construct hostile persona, attack from persona perspective, record paths
## Context Management
Each subagent operates in isolated adversarial context. Persona contamination is prevented by spawning separate agents per attack role. Findings are aggregated only after all probing rounds complete. Attack vectors are deduplicated before scoring.
## Output
Produces `RedTeamReport` containing: threat surface map, attack results by vector, assumption cascade analysis, resilience score (0.0-1.0), critical vulnerabilities, and recommended hardening actions.
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.