Campaign: Systematic adversarial attack from military/intelligence/AI-safety traditions. Core question: Can systematic adversarial attacks find fatal flaws? Methods: UFMCS Red Team Handbook v9.0, CIA SAT, Anthropic Red Teaming, NIST AI RMF, Inie et al. 12-strategy taxonomy.
Scanned 5/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill red-teaming --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Red Teaming?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-red-teaming)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: red-teaming
description: "Campaign: Systematic adversarial attack from military/intelligence/AI-safety traditions. Core question: Can systematic adversarial attacks find fatal flaws? Methods: UFMCS Red Team Handbook v9.0, CIA SAT, Anthropic Red Teaming, NIST AI RMF, Inie et al. 12-strategy taxonomy."
type: campaign
produces: RedTeamReport
artifact-types: [gap, hypothesis, research-question, idea, approach, experiment-design, claim]
---
# Red Teaming Campaign
Core question: **Can systematic adversarial attacks find fatal flaws in this artifact?**
## Methodology Sources
- UFMCS Red Team Handbook v9.0 — Military structured analytic techniques
- CIA Structured Analytic Techniques (SAT) — Key Assumptions Check, Devil's Advocacy
- Anthropic Red Teaming (2022) — AI-safety systematic probing methodology
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework — Threat surface enumeration
- Inie et al. (2024) — 12-strategy taxonomy of adversarial attacks
## Strategy Routing
| Artifact Type | Primary Strategy | Fallback Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| hypothesis, claim | assumption-challenge | adversarial-persona |
| research-question | alternative-analysis | groupthink-mitigation |
| idea, approach | systematic-probing | assumption-challenge |
| experiment-design | systematic-probing | alternative-analysis |
| gap | adversarial-persona | groupthink-mitigation |
## Budget Table
| Parameter | S (Quick) | M (Standard) | L (Deep) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attack vectors | 5 | 12 | 20 |
| Probing rounds | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| Personas | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Assumption checks | 5 | 10 | 20 |
## Tactics
- **structured-attack-campaign** — Threat surface enumeration, vector generation, systematic probing, aggregation
- **assumption-cascade** — Surface assumptions, dependency sort, root attack, cascade trace
- **adversarial-roleplay** — Construct hostile persona, attack from persona perspective, record paths
## Context Management
Each subagent operates in isolated adversarial context. Persona contamination is prevented by spawning separate agents per attack role. Findings are aggregated only after all probing rounds complete. Attack vectors are deduplicated before scoring.
## Output
Produces `RedTeamReport` containing: threat surface map, attack results by vector, assumption cascade analysis, resilience score (0.0-1.0), critical vulnerabilities, and recommended hardening actions.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!