Systematically collect performance data from platforms and papers
Scanned 5/27/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine---
name: leaderboard-harvesting
description: Systematically collect performance data from platforms and papers
execution: tactic
used-by: baseline-establishment
---
# Leaderboard Harvesting
## Purpose
Harvest structured performance data from leaderboard platforms (Papers With Code, benchmark-specific sites), survey papers, and official benchmark repositories. Produces deduplicated, provenance-tracked score collections.
## Stages
### Stage 1: Platform Scan
Identify and scrape all relevant leaderboard sources:
- Papers With Code task pages
- Benchmark-specific leaderboards (e.g., GLUE, ImageNet, WMT)
- GitHub benchmark repositories
- Survey papers with comprehensive comparison tables
**Yield**: List of leaderboard URLs + initial method counts per source.
### Stage 2: Paper Extraction
For methods not covered by leaderboards, extract scores directly from papers:
- Original method papers (primary source)
- Ablation studies and follow-up papers
- Reproduction studies and benchmarking papers
**Yield**: Raw score tuples with paper provenance.
### Stage 3: Cross-Validation
Compare scores across sources for the same method-dataset-metric triple:
- Flag discrepancies > 1 standard deviation
- Prefer primary sources when conflicts exist
- Note which scores come from official vs. unofficial implementations
**Yield**: Validated score set with confidence annotations.
### Stage 4: Dedup and Merge
Consolidate all sources into a single canonical dataset:
- Resolve method name aliases
- Merge duplicate entries with provenance tracking
- Assign confidence levels based on source agreement
**Yield**: Unified performance dataset ready for analysis.
## Minimum Yield
| Metric | Floor |
|--------|-------|
| Leaderboard sources checked | 3 |
| Methods with scores | 15 |
| Cross-validated score pairs | 10 |
| Deduplication conflicts resolved | 5 |
## SOPs Used
- method-discovery (for finding methods on leaderboards)
- score-extraction (for paper-based extraction)
- discrepancy-identification (for cross-validation)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...
Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...
Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API