Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Execute Research Spec

ASecurity

Execute the approved Research Spec phase by phase, producing checkpointed research state and a final summary.

499 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/24/2026
researchshellnode

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/24/2026

$npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill execute-research-spec --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Execute Research Spec?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Execute Research Spec
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yogsoth-ai-execute-research-spec/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-execute-research-spec)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: execute-research-spec
description: "Execute the approved Research Spec phase by phase, producing checkpointed research state and a final summary."
---

# execute-research-spec

## Purpose

Execute the approved Research Spec phase by phase, producing checkpointed research state and a final summary. The execution path is deterministic from the current SpecView and state events.

## Input Contract

```yaml
required: [approved_spec, context_index, phase_context_file]
optional: [latest_checkpoint]
constraints:
  - the target Phase must have exactly one context file
  - a complete checkpoint is required before a phase can be considered complete
```

## Execution Protocol

Before each route, reconstruct the in-memory `SpecView` by replaying the current Phase checkpoint events in sequence. `decisions` are the plan source; `open_questions` annotate existing plan items; the other Delta fields do not alter plan structure unless a decision explicitly references them.

For each phase:

1. Read `context/INDEX.md`, locate the unique Phase context file, validate checkpoint numbering, and load the latest complete checkpoint.
2. Select the first active Spec item whose dependencies are satisfied and whose status is not `complete`.
3. Load only the context and state slice required by that item. You MUST load the selected tactic as a skill; do not perform its research operation inline. The tactic body controls its required SOP calls and scientific thresholds.
4. After the tactic/SOP operation, append one checkpoint containing the eight Delta fields, process, results, status, and open questions. Do not edit earlier checkpoints.
5. Evaluate the current completion gate. Mark the plan item complete only when the gate is objectively satisfied. If it is not satisfied, keep the item active and record the gap.
6. Evaluate the backtrack condition. A triggered condition requires an explicit user decision, recorded as a new `decisions` event, before returning to an earlier stage.

## Checkpoint Contract

Each appended checkpoint contains:

```text
Checkpoint: <unique increasing number>-<UTC timestamp>
Phase: <phase-slug>
Source: <tactic/sop or product layer>
Status: complete | partial
Input slice: <state range read>
Process: <operation performed>
Results: <observed result>
Delta:
  findings: []
  evidence_updates: []
  hypothesis_updates: []
  assumption_updates: []
  uncertainties: []
  decisions: []
  open_questions: []
  recommended_jumps: []
Open questions: <unresolved items>
```

Merge fields by stable keys. Preserve replaced decisions with their replacement reason. Deduplicate recommended jumps by `(target, reason)` and treat them as suggestions, never as permission to bypass a gate.

## Recovery Protocol

On a new session, read `context/INDEX.md`, find the target Phase file and latest checkpoint, replay events to rebuild `SpecView`, and resume at the first incomplete item. If the latest checkpoint is `partial`, read its open questions, return to the latest `complete` checkpoint, and rebuild from there. Check Phase, sequence continuity, and all eight Delta fields before continuing. Do not use scratch text as evidence and do not rerun an item already recorded complete unless a new decision explains why.

## Output Contract

```yaml
produces:
  - appended_phase_checkpoints
  - merged_research_state
  - final_research_summary
delta_fields:
  - findings
  - evidence_updates
  - hypothesis_updates
  - assumption_updates
  - uncertainties
  - decisions
  - open_questions
  - recommended_jumps
```

## Completion Criteria

Every required Spec item has a complete checkpoint whose completion gate is satisfied, or the final report names the first unmet gate and its supporting evidence. The final summary references all Phase context files and the checkpoints used to derive it.

## Failure and Backtrack

Missing or damaged context, a non-contiguous checkpoint sequence, an absent Delta field, or a missing SpecView source blocks routing and reports the exact location. Conflicting facts or decisions are retained as `uncertainties`; the dependent path remains paused until a user or designated reviewer writes a resolving decision. Execution never substitutes elapsed time, an empty result, or an external interruption for a scientific completion gate.

## Boundary

Persistence is append-only Markdown checkpoints in the existing Phase context file. `SpecView` is an in-memory projection and is never persisted as a second object. This product-shell skill is not a graph node and must not be added to the 267-node registry.

Attribution

yogsoth-aiyogsoth-ai
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from yogsoth-ai →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report co...

502942 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

953191 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end p...

502941 votes

Literature Review

Assistance with writing literature reviews by searching for academic sources via Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref and PubMed APIs. Use when the user needs to find papers on a topic, get details for specific DOIs, or draft sections of a literature review with proper citations.

6511 votes
View all in research →