Detect an explicit contradiction in logical derivations, claims, or evidence relations; classify whether it is formal, empirical, scope-dependent, or unresolved.
Scanned 9/24/2026
npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill detect-contradiction --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Detect Contradiction?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-detect-contradiction)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: detect-contradiction
description: "Detect an explicit contradiction in logical derivations, claims, or evidence relations; classify whether it is formal, empirical, scope-dependent, or unresolved."
---
# detect-contradiction
## Purpose
Detect and classify explicit contradictions in derivations, claims, or evidence relations.
## Input contract
```yaml
required: [claims_or_derivation, evidence_relations, scope_context]
optional: [logic_rules, causal_graph, contradiction_taxonomy]
constraints: [distinguish formal, empirical, scope-dependent, and unresolved contradiction; preserve both sides]
```
## Procedure
1. Normalize claims, predicates, scope, and evidence polarity.
2. Compare opposing claims or support/contradict relations under shared scope.
3. Classify the conflict and record the exact conflicting statements.
4. Create a contradiction record and identify the evidence needed for adjudication.
If the contradiction concerns treatment, component, or effect attribution, consider `analyze-intervention` as the next tactic.
If the contradiction rests on a shared but untested premise, consider `challenge-assumption` as the next tactic.
## Output contract
```yaml
produces: [contradiction_register, conflicting_relations, classification, adjudication_questions]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, open_questions]
```
## Quality gates
- Support and contradict evidence are both recorded; contradiction cannot be hidden by selecting one polarity.
- Scope mismatch is labeled scope-dependent rather than formal contradiction.
- Each contradiction includes both endpoints and a reproducible comparison basis.
## Parameterization
The caller must provide claim schema, evidence polarity vocabulary, scope rules, logic/causal relation types, and the adjudication status vocabulary.
## Failure and counterexamples
Reject conflicts caused only by incomparable metrics, different scopes, or duplicate text; retain them as unresolved comparability issues.
## Provenance map
- resolved: stress-test/contradiction-detection
- resolved: knowledge-structuring/contradiction-flagging
- concept: stress-test/detect-contradiction
- intermediate: Pass3/detect-contradiction
- intermediate: Pass3/flag-contradictory-evidence
## Preserved source criteria ledger
| source | physical line | kind | source criterion |
|---|---:|---|---|
| knowledge-structuring/contradiction-flagging | 18 | gate | Record simultaneous support and contradict evidence and do not ignore either. |
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!