Audit a claimed isomorphism/equivalence by constructing an explicit mapping, testing which structures/operations/invariants are preserved, searching counterexamples, and downgrading the claim to the strongest defensible relation when full isomorphism fails.
Scanned 9/24/2026
npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill audit-structural-equivalence --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Audit Structural Equivalence?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-audit-structural-equivalence)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: audit-structural-equivalence
description: "Audit a claimed isomorphism/equivalence by constructing an explicit mapping, testing which structures/operations/invariants are preserved, searching counterexamples, and downgrading the claim to the strongest defensible relation when full isomorphism fails."
---
# audit-structural-equivalence
## Purpose
Audit a claimed isomorphism or equivalence and downgrade it to the strongest defensible relation when preservation fails.
## Input contract
```yaml
mode_contracts:
isomorphism: &structural_audit_input
required: [source_structure, target_structure, equivalence_claim]
optional: [required_invariants, operations, constraints]
constraints: [mapping_domains_and_preservation_obligations_must_be_explicit]
substructure: *structural_audit_input
homomorphism: *structural_audit_input
shared-invariant: *structural_audit_input
analogy: *structural_audit_input
```
## Execution protocol
Do not perform called SOP operations inline; each loaded SOP owns its contract and thresholds.
1. You MUST load skill `extract-structural-mapping` to construct the object, relation, operation, and invariant mapping.
2. You MUST load skill `test-structure-preservation` to test preservation. You MUST load skill `generate-counterexample` to search minimal counterexamples.
3. You MUST load skill `downgrade-equivalence-claim` to downgrade the claim and record lost invariants.
Deviation: if the claim is only analogy by scope, run the analogy branch and do not report isomorphism.
## Output contract
```yaml
mode_contracts:
isomorphism: &structural_audit_output
produces: [claimed_sides, maps_attempted, monsters_found, dimension_count_result, highest_defended_rung, required_wording_change]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions]
substructure: *structural_audit_output
homomorphism: *structural_audit_output
shared-invariant: *structural_audit_output
analogy: *structural_audit_output
```
## Thresholds and quality gates
- All required relations, operations, and invariants must have pass/fail/unknown status.
- A full equivalence claim fails on one unprincipled preservation counterexample.
## Failure and counterexamples
Do not infer equivalence from surface similarity. Exclusions introduced only after a counterexample are ad hoc unless independently justified.
## Provenance map
- resolved: isomorphism-falsification
## Preserved source criteria ledger
| source | source line | kind | source criterion |
|---|---:|---|---|
| v4 architecture | node desc | textual | Preserve structures/operations/invariants; downgrade when full equivalence fails. |
## Context checkpoint / Delta notes
Append mapping, tested invariants, counterexamples, and final relation.
## Mode branches
- `isomorphism`: all declared structures and operations must preserve.
- `substructure`: test inclusion only.
- `homomorphism`: test operation-preserving mapping with relaxed structure.
- `shared-invariant`: test named invariant subset.
- `analogy`: report transferable relation without equivalence claim.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!