Systematic Review
ASecurityRun a PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic literature review with optional meta-analysis — protocol registration, systematic search with documented strategy, screening with inclusion/exclusion criteria, risk-of-bias assessment (RoB 2 / ROBINS-I), effect-size synthesis with heterogeneity and GRADE, plus PRISMA-trAIce AI-transparency checklist and RAISE responsible-AI reporting. Use when the user asks for a systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA-compliant evidence synthesis, or a survey that must...
- 9 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 1 view
- Added October 7, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100Pro scans all 5 files and shows the line behind each finding
npx -y skills add Yichen-ZJU/claude-for-research --skill systematic-review --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Systematic Review?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yichen-zju-systematic-review)---
name: systematic-review
description: Run a PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic literature review with optional meta-analysis — protocol registration, systematic search with documented strategy, screening with inclusion/exclusion criteria, risk-of-bias assessment (RoB 2 / ROBINS-I), effect-size synthesis with heterogeneity and GRADE, plus PRISMA-trAIce AI-transparency checklist and RAISE responsible-AI reporting. Use when the user asks for a systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA-compliant evidence synthesis, or a survey that must meet formal reporting standards (as opposed to a narrative literature review).
argument-hint: <research-question>
---
# Systematic Review(PRISMA 系统性综述)
做符合 PRISMA 2020 规范的系统性综述/荟萃分析。**和 `literature-review`(叙述性综述)的区别**:本 skill 产出可注册、可复现、有合规报告的正式证据合成——搜索策略、纳排标准、偏倚评估全部留痕。
参考协议(本 skill references/ 下,出处见文末):
- `prisma_trAIce_protocol.md` — AI 透明报告清单(JMIR 2025),Mandatory 项不过即阻断
- `raise_framework.md` — 证据合成中负责任使用 AI(NIHR/UCL)
- `systematic_review_protocol.md` — 五阶段流程与检查点
- `systematic_review_toolkit.md` — Cochrane 手册、RoB 2、ROBINS-I、I²、GRADE、协议注册
## 五阶段流程
```
Phase 1 协议制定与注册
RQ(PICO/SPIDER 框架)→ 检索策略(数据库、关键词、布尔式)
→ 纳入/排除标准 → 写 protocol(templates 见 toolkit)
→ 可注册 OSF/PROSPERO。先与用户确认 protocol 再动手
Phase 2 系统检索
按 protocol 执行(arxiv MCP + web_search + Semantic Scholar API)
记录每个数据库的检索式、日期、命中数 → PRISMA 流程图数据
Phase 3 筛选与选择
标题/摘要初筛 → 全文复筛,每一步记录排除理由和数量
更新 PRISMA flow: identified → screened → assessed → included
Phase 4 数据提取与偏倚评估
提取表(作者/年/方法/样本/效应量/结论)
RoB 2(随机试验)或 ROBINS-I(非随机)逐篇评估,红绿灯汇总
Phase 5 综合与报告
可定量 → meta 分析(效应量、异质性 I²、敏感性分析、GRADE 证据分级)
不可定量 → 叙述性综合(也要 GRADE 自评)
PRISMA 2020 报告(27 项清单)+ trAIce AI 使用清单 + RAISE 角色矩阵
```
## 检查点(阻断性)
1. Protocol 未经用户确认 → 不得开始检索
2. PRISMA-trAIce **Mandatory** 项未满足 → 阻断交付
3. 检索策略、纳排标准、分析方法的文档缺失 → 视为未完成(可复现性是硬要求)
4. 灰区文献(无法确认存在)= FAIL,不入报告(同全局 provenance 约定)
## 产出与落盘
slug 约定:`outputs/<slug>-sr-protocol.md`、`outputs/<slug>-sr-flow.md`、`outputs/<slug>-sr-extraction.md`、`outputs/<slug>-sr.md`(最终报告)+ `<slug>.provenance.md`。meta 分析的原始数据(效应量表、I² 计算脚本)必须保留。
## 合规披露
最终报告必须包含:AI 使用声明(哪些环节用了 AI、人工如何核验)——用 `ai-use-disclosure` skill 生成。检索日期、数据库清单、各库命中数。
## 出处
协议文件改编自 ARS (academic-research-skills, Cheng-I Wu, CC-BY-NC 4.0)、PRISMA-trAIce (Holst et al., JMIR AI 2025, doi:10.2196/80247)、RAISE (Thomas et al., NIHR ESG BPWG, 2025)。
Files in this skill
- SKILL.md
- references/prisma_trAIce_protocol.md
- references/raise_framework.md
- references/systematic_review_protocol.md
- references/systematic_review_toolkit.md
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.