Skip to content
Back to skills

Source Comparison

ASecurity

Compare multiple sources on a topic and produce a source-grounded matrix of agreements, disagreements, and confidence. Use when the user asks to compare papers, methods, tools, models, or claims across sources.

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 14, 2026
researchgit

Works with

  • claude code
  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 14, 2026

npx -y skills add Yichen-ZJU/lemvo --skill source-comparison --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Source Comparison?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Source Comparison
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yichen-zju-source-comparison-lemvo/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yichen-zju-source-comparison-lemvo)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: source-comparison
description: Compare multiple sources on a topic and produce a source-grounded matrix of agreements, disagreements, and confidence. Use when the user asks to compare papers, methods, tools, models, or claims across sources.
argument-hint: <topic>
---

# Source Comparison

Compare sources for the user's topic.

Derive a short slug from the comparison topic (lowercase, hyphens, no filler words, ≤5 words). Use this slug for all files in this run.

## Tools (Claude Code)

- Web search: `web_search`. Fetch pages: `browser` fetch.
- Academic papers: the `arxiv` MCP tools — `discover_papers` (search), `get_paper_content` (read), `answer_pdf_queries` (Q&A on a paper's PDF), `read_files_from_github_repository` (paper code). If these tools are not visible, fall back to web_search/browser fetch on arxiv.org and record the degradation.
- Subagents: the `Agent` tool with `subagent_type` `researcher` / `verifier`. Spawn parallel researchers in one message.

## Requirements

- Before starting, outline the comparison plan: which sources to compare, which dimensions to evaluate, expected output structure. Write the plan to `outputs/.plans/<slug>.md`. Briefly summarize the plan to the user and continue immediately. Do not ask for confirmation or wait for a proceed response unless the user explicitly requested plan review.
- Use `researcher` subagents to gather source material when the comparison set is broad, and the `verifier` subagent to verify sources and add inline citations to the final matrix.
- Build a comparison matrix covering: source, key claim, evidence type, caveats, confidence.
- Generate charts only when real source-backed quantitative data supports them; otherwise include a source-backed table or chart specification. Use Mermaid for method or architecture comparisons when the structure is source-supported.
- Distinguish agreement, disagreement, and uncertainty clearly.
- Save exactly one comparison to `outputs/<slug>-comparison.md`.
- End with a `Sources` section containing direct URLs for every source used.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.