Use when deciding whether to compact agent context -- the window is filling up, you are about to switch from one phase to another (research, planning, implementation, debugging), a failed approach left dead-end reasoning, or a previous mid-task compaction lost critical state.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill strategic-context-compaction --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Strategic Context Compaction?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yeaight7-strategic-context-compaction-agent-powerups)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: strategic-context-compaction
description: Use when deciding whether to compact agent context -- the window is filling up, you are about to switch from one phase to another (research, planning, implementation, debugging), a failed approach left dead-end reasoning, or a previous mid-task compaction lost critical state.
---
## Purpose
Compact at logical boundaries to preserve high-value context while clearing noise. Arbitrary or mid-task compaction loses critical state -- file paths, variable names, partial reasoning -- that is expensive to reconstruct.
## When to Use
- The context window is filling and you are at a phase boundary (research, planning, implementation, debugging)
- A failed approach left dead-end reasoning that pollutes the next attempt
- You are starting a conceptually distinct task in the same session
- A prior mid-task compaction dropped state you then had to rebuild
## Inputs
- The current session state and which phase transition is approaching
- Knowledge of what is already saved durably (task list, files, git, memory) versus only in conversation
## Workflow
1. **Decide whether to compact by transition.** Use the boundary table; default to NOT compacting mid-work.
| Transition | Compact? | Reason |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Research -- Planning | Yes | Research context is bulky; the plan is the distilled output |
| Planning -- Implementation | Yes | Plan is saved in tasks/files; context is free to reset |
| Implementation -- Testing | Maybe | Keep if tests reference recent code; compact if switching focus area |
| Debugging -- Next feature | Yes | Debug traces pollute unrelated work |
| Mid-implementation | No | Losing file paths, variable names, partial state is costly |
| After a failed approach | Yes | Clear dead-end reasoning before trying a new approach |
2. **Save anything you cannot reconstruct cheaply before compacting.**
- Write the plan to a task list or file before compacting after research
- Commit or stash work-in-progress code before compacting after debugging
- Note key file paths in the next prompt if they will be needed again
3. **Know what survives versus what is lost.** Anything in the Lost column must be persisted in step 2 first.
| Survives | Lost |
| --- | --- |
| CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md instructions | Intermediate reasoning |
| Task list (TodoWrite) | File contents read in session |
| Files on disk | Tool call history |
| Git state | Verbally stated preferences |
| Memory files | Multi-step conversation context |
4. **Compact with an intent-carrying summary prompt, then restore.**
- Do not compact to "clean up" during active multi-file implementation
- Pass forward intent, e.g. `/compact -- now implementing auth middleware per plan`
- After compaction, re-read the task list or plan file to restore intent
## Output
- A compaction decision (do it now / wait until the next boundary) with the reason
- A pre-compaction save of any non-reconstructible state (plan file, commit/stash, noted paths)
- A summary prompt that carries intent into the cleared context
## Token Awareness
- Each loaded skill adds 1-5K tokens to context; load skills on demand, not at session start
- CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md are always loaded -- keep them lean
- Duplicate instructions (root config plus plugin skill) are the most common waste
## Verification
- [ ] The chosen action matches the transition table -- no compaction during active multi-file implementation
- [ ] Everything in the Lost column that is still needed was persisted (file, commit/stash, or next prompt) before compacting
- [ ] The compact prompt carries forward intent rather than clearing blindly
- [ ] After compaction, the task list or plan file was re-read to restore intent
## Failure Modes
- **Mid-task compaction** — compacting during active multi-file work and losing paths, variable names, and partial state that must then be rebuilt.
- **Compacting before saving** — clearing context while the plan, WIP code, or key paths live only in conversation and not on disk or in tasks.
- **Blind compaction** — using `/compact` with no intent summary, so the cleared session has no direction and re-derives the goal.
- **Skipping the restore step** — not re-reading the task list or plan after compaction, then drifting from the original intent.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!