Skip to content
Back to skills

Requirement Review

ASecurity

Independently assess proposed IR/SR changes or a justified reuse conclusion, with their supporting Feature and Scenario analysis. Establish the first requirement basis for downstream design.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 7, 2026
ai-agentsgosql

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 11 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 7, 2026

npx -y skills add xiongxianfei/rigorloop --skill requirement-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Requirement Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Requirement Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/xiongxianfei-requirement-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/xiongxianfei-requirement-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: requirement-review
description: Independently assess proposed IR/SR changes or a justified reuse conclusion, with their supporting Feature and Scenario analysis. Establish the first requirement basis for downstream design.
---

# Requirement Review

Review the request interpretation and proposed requirement basis together. Assess fidelity to the RR, existing ownership and duplication, stakeholder scope, assessability, material uncertainty and relevant Feature/Scenario coverage. A justified no-change conclusion can pass without manufacturing requirement edits.

The author does not provide independent approval of their own subjects. Record actual reviewer/contributor attribution, inspected subjects, governing basis, findings and limitations. Approval permits downstream design to rely on the reviewed obligations; it does not establish Function completeness, allocated ARs, implementation correctness or permission for external actions.

Do not require complete Function or AR allocation as a condition of approving requirements for design. Return wrong needs, missing obligations and scope conflicts to requirement-analysis. Review corrections against their effects while maintaining adequate coverage of the complete current requirement basis. Earlier approval never silently covers rewritten obligations.

Use review prepare/show/record for the requirements purpose. The requirement owner can select the resulting accepted Basis after applicable approval is recorded. Retain unresolved findings through later submissions; a save creates no approval beyond the reviewer's actual conclusion.

## Recording boundary

For Change-managed work, read the packaged operational interface reference before relying on or updating current state. Use supported CLI tasks and the inspected opaque revision; skills do not use SQL or edit runtime storage. An isolated invocation keeps its requested scope. Installation alone does not adopt workflow policy.

## Resource map

- READ `references/operational-recording.md` when inspecting or recording Change-managed work.
- READ `references/targeted-recording-v2.schema.json` when constructing a recording request.
- READ `references/rigorloop-records-v4.schema.json` when checking the types used by that request.

- READ `references/rem-models-requirements.md` when assessing requirement validity and acceptance.
- READ `references/rem-models-scenarios.md` when assessing affected Scenario coverage.
- READ `references/rem-models-system-design.md` when assessing Feature meaning.
- READ `references/rem-methods-requirement-analysis.md` when checking analysis sufficiency or reuse.

- READ `references/requirement-to-delivery-model.md` when applying its criteria to this responsibility.

- READ `references/review-reliance.md` when applying its criteria to this responsibility.

- READ `references/review-assessment.md` when applying its criteria to this responsibility.

## Expected output

Report the actual scoped outcome, governing basis, changed subjects or recorded judgment, material gaps and the next authorized action. Distinguish progress, review approval, final verification and external publication; claim only outcomes supported by this invocation.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md3.1 KB
  • references/operational-recording.md6.4 KB
  • references/rem-methods-requirement-analysis.md11 KB
  • references/rem-models-requirements.md8.2 KB
  • references/rem-models-scenarios.md5.9 KB
  • references/rem-models-system-design.md5.3 KB
  • references/requirement-to-delivery-model.md1.6 KB
  • references/review-assessment.md1.9 KB
  • references/review-reliance.md2.6 KB
  • references/rigorloop-records-v4.schema.json33.9 KB
  • references/targeted-recording-v2.schema.json28.6 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.