Skip to content
Back to skills

Requirement Analysis

ASecurity

Reconcile a request, proposal, issue or incident with existing IRs, SRs, Features and Scenarios. Propose justified reuse, refinement or new requirements before requirement review.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 7, 2026
ai-agentsgosql

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 11 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 7, 2026

npx -y skills add xiongxianfei/rigorloop --skill requirement-analysis --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Requirement Analysis?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Requirement Analysis
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/xiongxianfei-requirement-analysis/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/xiongxianfei-requirement-analysis)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: requirement-analysis
description: Reconcile a request, proposal, issue or incident with existing IRs, SRs, Features and Scenarios. Propose justified reuse, refinement or new requirements before requirement review.
---

# Requirement Analysis

Treat incoming material as RR input. Preserve its source and meaning; a suggested technology or approved direction is not automatically an engineering obligation.

Inspect the applicable existing requirements before creating identities. Compare need, scope, conditions and acceptance: reuse without modification is a valid outcome; refine an existing requirement when its meaning evolves; create an IR only for a distinct durable need. One RR may affect several needs. Keep unresolved or conflicting portions visible.

Apply the packaged Requirement Analysis and 5W2H methods when deriving or refining IR/SR content. Confirm the stakeholder-visible Feature and black-box Scenarios. Preserve stable IDs and the distinction between a capability, its concrete use and a delivery milestone. Derive assessable SRs, including relevant quality, data, failure and compatibility obligations. Do not create a Function per SR or demand complete Function/AR allocation before requirement approval.

Update the owning repository definitions and concise applicable rationale. Record RR interpretation, reuse/refinement/creation dispositions, scope, acceptance and material uncertainty in the current handoff. A separate proposal dossier is not required. Prepare the exact proposed requirement basis for independent requirement-review; do not finalize architecture or approve your own work.

## Recording boundary

For Change-managed work, read the packaged operational interface reference before relying on or updating current state. Use supported CLI tasks and the inspected opaque revision; skills do not use SQL or edit runtime storage. An isolated invocation keeps its requested scope. Installation alone does not adopt workflow policy.

## Resource map

- READ `references/operational-recording.md` when inspecting or recording Change-managed work.
- READ `references/targeted-recording-v2.schema.json` when constructing a recording request.
- READ `references/rigorloop-records-v4.schema.json` when checking the types used by that request.

- READ `references/rem-methods-requirement-analysis.md` when reconciling RR and deriving IR/SR obligations.
- READ `references/rem-methods-scenario-analysis.md` when analyzing stakeholder use.
- READ `references/rem-methods-5w2h.md` when creating or materially refining a requirement.
- READ `references/rem-models-requirements.md` when checking requirement identities and relationships.
- READ `references/rem-models-scenarios.md` when editing governed Scenarios.
- READ `references/rem-models-system-design.md` when confirming Feature meaning.

- READ `references/requirement-to-delivery-model.md` when applying its criteria to this responsibility.

## Expected output

Report the actual scoped outcome, governing basis, changed subjects or recorded judgment, material gaps and the next authorized action. Distinguish progress, review approval, final verification and external publication; claim only outcomes supported by this invocation.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB
  • references/operational-recording.md6.4 KB
  • references/rem-methods-5w2h.md4.9 KB
  • references/rem-methods-requirement-analysis.md10.8 KB
  • references/rem-methods-scenario-analysis.md7.9 KB
  • references/rem-models-requirements.md8.2 KB
  • references/rem-models-scenarios.md5.9 KB
  • references/rem-models-system-design.md5.2 KB
  • references/requirement-to-delivery-model.md1.6 KB
  • references/rigorloop-records-v4.schema.json33.9 KB
  • references/targeted-recording-v2.schema.json28.6 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.