Distill Skill Autopilot's accumulated usage evidence into personalized rules — the self-evolution step. Use when the autopilot announces an evolution window, or the user says "evolve", "学习一下我的习惯", "update your instincts", "distill autopilot".
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add WinterDDo/claude-code-command-autopilot --skill evolve --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Evolve?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/winterddo-evolve-claude-code-skill-autopilot)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: evolve
description: Distill Skill Autopilot's accumulated usage evidence into personalized rules — the self-evolution step. Use when the autopilot announces an evolution window, or the user says "evolve", "学习一下我的习惯", "update your instincts", "distill autopilot".
---
# Evolution pass (prompt-space gradient descent)
You are updating this system's weights: the personalized rules injected into every prompt. Be conservative — a wrong learned rule costs the user on every message.
## Procedure
1. Read `~/.claude/command-autopilot/events.jsonl`. Also read `learned.json` if present (schema below).
2. Cluster events by task-type × command/skill. Look for consistent patterns, for example:
- a command suggested repeatedly and consistently dismissed → candidate negative rule
- a skill invoked on the same kind of task again and again → candidate positive rule ("invoke X early for Y-type tasks")
- a habit self-used regularly → mastered, teaching for it should stop
3. Apply the discipline:
- **Promote** only patterns with ≥3 consistent observations and no contradicting evidence → `status: "in_force"`.
- **Demote** existing in_force rules contradicted by new evidence (decrement `evidence`; at 0, set `status: "candidate"`).
- **Decay**: rules not reconfirmed for ~60 days → delete.
- Max 5 in_force rules; each `text` ≤ 25 tokens, English, imperative, generic phrasing ("research-type tasks: offer /fork early").
- NEVER write rules that override the safety net (/rewind) or the one-suggestion contract.
4. Write `learned.json`:
```json
{
"updated": "<ISO>",
"rules": [
{"text": "...", "evidence": 4, "first": "<ISO>", "last": "<ISO>", "status": "in_force"}
]
}
```
5. Archive processed events — rotate FIRST to avoid racing concurrent appends: rename `events.jsonl` to `events-archive-<timestamp>.jsonl`, and only then read the renamed file for the distillation. New events land in a fresh `events.jsonl` untouched. (If you already read before rotating, rotate anyway and accept the tiny overlap.)
6. Report to the user in their language: what was learned (each rule + its evidence), what was demoted or deleted, and one line on what will change. If nothing met the bar, say so plainly — no fabricated learnings.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!