Skip to content
Back to skills

Evidence Auditor

ASecurity

Use when `paper-review` needs a claim-by-claim evidence gap report grounded in an extracted claim ledger.

  • 512 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 4 views
  • Added February 8, 2026
researchgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 20, 2026

npx -y skills add WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills --skill evidence-auditor --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Evidence Auditor?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Evidence Auditor
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/willoscar-evidence-auditor/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/willoscar-evidence-auditor)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: evidence-auditor
description: "Use when `paper-review` needs a claim-by-claim evidence gap report grounded in an extracted claim ledger."
---

# Evidence Auditor

## Triggers & routing

- **Trigger**: evidence audit, missing evidence, unsupported claims, 审稿证据审计, 证据缺口.
- **Use when**: `paper-review` 流程中,需要逐条检查 claim 的证据链、缺 baseline、评测薄弱点。
- **Skip if**: 缺少 claims 输入(例如还没有 `output/CLAIMS.md`)。
- **Network**: none.
- **Guardrail**: 只写“缺口/风险/下一步验证”,不要替作者补写论述或引入新主张。


Transforms a claim ledger into a gap report for `paper-review`.

## Input

- `output/CLAIMS.md`

## Output

- `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`
- `output/EVIDENCE_AUDIT.jsonl` (`review-evidence-gap.v1`)

## Contract

Each gap block should include:
- claim reference
- what evidence is already present
- what is missing or weak
- minimal fix
- severity

Each JSONL record must retain `claim_id` and a stable `gap_id` so the final
review can cite the exact failure rather than paraphrasing an unlocated concern.

## Script boundary

`scripts/run.py` should:
- iterate existing claims only
- classify the likely evidence risk
- write actionable, bounded gap items

It should not invent new claims or rewrite the manuscript.

## Acceptance

- every claim has a corresponding evidence note or gap item
- minimal fixes are actionable and concrete
- structured records join back to every `claim_id`

## Non-goals

- manuscript rewriting
- novelty assessment
- recommendation writing

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.