Build per-chapter (H2) writing briefs (NO PROSE) so the final survey reads like a paper (chapter leads + cross-H3 coherence) without inflating the ToC. **Trigger**: chapter briefs, H2 briefs, chapter lead plan, section intent, 章节意图, 章节导读, H2 卡片. **Use when**: `outline/outline.yml` + `outline/subsection_briefs.jsonl` exist and you want thicker chapters (fewer headings, more logic). **Skip if**: the outline is still changing heavily (fix outline/mapping first). **Network**: none. **Guardrail**:...
Scanned 2/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills --skill chapter-briefs --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Chapter Briefs?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/willoscar-chapter-briefs)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: chapter-briefs
description: |
Build per-chapter (H2) writing briefs (NO PROSE) so the final survey reads like a paper (chapter leads + cross-H3 coherence) without inflating the ToC.
**Trigger**: chapter briefs, H2 briefs, chapter lead plan, section intent, 章节意图, 章节导读, H2 卡片.
**Use when**: `outline/outline.yml` + `outline/subsection_briefs.jsonl` exist and you want thicker chapters (fewer headings, more logic).
**Skip if**: the outline is still changing heavily (fix outline/mapping first).
**Network**: none.
**Guardrail**: NO PROSE; do not invent papers; only reference subsection ids and already-mapped papers.
---
# Chapter Briefs (H2 writing cards) [NO PROSE]
Purpose: turn each **H2 chapter that contains H3 subsections** into a chapter-level writing card so the writer can:
- add a chapter lead paragraph block (coherence)
- keep a consistent comparison axis across the chapter
- avoid “8 small islands” where every H3 restarts from scratch
This artifact is **internal intent**, not reader-facing prose.
Why this matters for writing quality:
- Chapter briefs prevent the "paragraph island" failure mode: without a throughline, each H3 restarts and repeats openers.
- Treat `throughline` and `lead_paragraph_plan` as decision constraints, not copyable sentences.
## Inputs
- `outline/outline.yml`
- `outline/subsection_briefs.jsonl`
- Optional: `GOAL.md`
## Outputs
- `outline/chapter_briefs.jsonl`
## Output format (`outline/chapter_briefs.jsonl`)
JSONL (one object per H2 chapter that has H3 subsections).
Required fields:
- `section_id`, `section_title`
- `subsections` (list of `{sub_id,title}` in outline order)
- `synthesis_mode` (one of: `clusters`, `timeline`, `tradeoff_matrix`, `case_study`, `tension_resolution`)
- `synthesis_preview` (1–2 bullets; how the chapter will synthesize across H3 without template-y “Taken together…”)
- `throughline` (3–6 bullets)
- `key_contrasts` (2–6 bullets; pull from each H3 `contrast_hook` when available)
- `lead_paragraph_plan` (2–3 bullets; plan only, not prose)
- Each bullet should be chapter-specific and mention concrete handles (axes / contrast hooks / evaluation lens).
- Avoid generic glue like "Para 1: introduce the chapter" without naming what is being compared.
- `bridge_terms` (5–12 tokens; union of H3 bridge terms)
## How C5 uses this (chapter lead contract)
The writer uses `outline/chapter_briefs.jsonl` to draft `sections/S<sec_id>_lead.md` (body-only; no headings).
Contract (paper-like, no new facts):
- Preview the chapter’s comparison axes (2–3) and how the H3s connect; do not restate the table of contents.
- Reuse `key_contrasts` / `bridge_terms` as *handles* (not templates) so the chapter reads coherent without repeating "Taken together" everywhere.
- Keep it grounded (>=2 citations later in C5; do not invent new papers here).
## Workflow
0. (Optional) Read `GOAL.md` to pin scope/audience, and inject that constraint into the chapter throughline.
1. Read `outline/outline.yml` and list H2 chapters that have H3 subsections.
2. Read `outline/subsection_briefs.jsonl` and group briefs by `section_id`.
3. For each chapter, produce:
- a **throughline**: what the whole chapter is trying to compare/explain
- **key contrasts**: 2–6 contrasts that span multiple H3s
- a **synthesis_mode**: enforce synthesis diversity across chapters (avoid repeating the same closing paragraph shape)
- a **lead paragraph plan**: 2–3 paragraph objectives (what the chapter lead must do)
- a **bridge_terms** set to keep terminology stable across H3s
4. Write `outline/chapter_briefs.jsonl`.
## Quality checklist
- [ ] One record per H2-with-H3 chapter.
- [ ] No placeholders (`TODO`/`…`/`(placeholder)`/template instructions).
- [ ] `throughline` and `key_contrasts` are chapter-specific (not copy/paste generic).
- [ ] `lead_paragraph_plan` bullets explicitly preview 2–3 comparison axes and how the H3 subsections partition them (no generic chapter-intro boilerplate).
## Script
### Quick Start
- `python .codex/skills/chapter-briefs/scripts/run.py --help`
- `python .codex/skills/chapter-briefs/scripts/run.py --workspace workspaces/<ws>`
### All Options
- `--workspace <dir>`
- `--unit-id <U###>`
- `--inputs <semicolon-separated>`
- `--outputs <semicolon-separated>`
- `--checkpoint <C#>`
### Examples
- Default IO:
- `python .codex/skills/chapter-briefs/scripts/run.py --workspace workspaces/<ws>`
- Explicit IO:
- `python .codex/skills/chapter-briefs/scripts/run.py --workspace workspaces/<ws> --inputs "outline/outline.yml;outline/subsection_briefs.jsonl;GOAL.md" --outputs "outline/chapter_briefs.jsonl"`
### Refinement marker (recommended; prevents churn)
When you are satisfied with chapter briefs, create:
- `outline/chapter_briefs.refined.ok`
This is an explicit "I reviewed/refined this" signal:
- prevents scripts from regenerating and undoing your work
- (in strict runs) can be used as a completion signal to avoid silently accepting a bootstrap scaffold
### Notes
- This helper is a bootstrap; refine manually if needed.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!