Improve code structure while pinning and proving unchanged externally observable behavior.
Scanned 10/6/2026
npx -y skills add williamwue/oh-my-stack --skill refactoring --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Refactoring?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/williamwue-refactoring-10270973)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: refactoring
description: "Improve code structure while pinning and proving unchanged externally observable behavior."
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# Refactoring
## OMP model routing
At the start of this workflow, run `../../scripts/model-resolution.mjs`
with `--runtime omp --cwd` set to the current workspace. Read the returned
manifest: nearest project first, then the user's `~/.omp/agent/` default.
For each configured route, select its named agent through OMP's native
task-agent selector and verify that its source matches the chosen scope;
for a canonical role, use the manifest role's `agent` name (user
defaults use namespaced `ohmystack-role-*` agents).
Preserve panel entry order and count. If no mapping is present, retain the
workflow's normal runtime model. Verify resolved worker model and thinking
level from OMP session/job metadata, not from the role file alone.
When `task` returns a background job id, retain it until terminal status.
On OMP hosts exposing `proc://` (observed in 18.3.0), use `read proc://<id>`
for non-consuming status, `wait` to drain, and `write proc://<id>/kill`
to cancel an owned job with the required approval. Confirm cancellation
before replacing a worker and reject results from older generations.
Do not assume the deprecated `hub` tool exists. If safe cancellation
is unavailable, wait or report the unit incomplete; never silently
treat an unconfirmed worker as cancelled.
For this workflow's implementers use `code.feature-refactoring`.
## Child session handoff
Read [the handoff contract](../poteto-mode/references/subagent-handoff.md).
New tasks, repair rounds, retries, and queue items use fresh child sessions
with the original brief, every later directive, prior findings and responses,
and unresolved objections. Reuse only for required costly live state, and
only when the host allows it. Stop and fence active writers before replacement.
A host-owned orchestrator's model catalog, workspace binding, child tools,
and review-round rules take precedence over the native binding above.
Keep its task handles and attribution receipts. Do not use a backing child
conversation as a new delegated review, or claim native-record verification
for a host-owned child. Report attribution evidence gaps explicitly.
The root owns the behavior contract. Structure may change; behavior may not.
1. Use `how` to trace the affected behavior and callers. Pin the current
contract with a characterization test, snapshot, equivalence harness, or
recorded real-surface result before structural edits. Type checking alone is
not a behavior pin.
2. Name the current reader-load problem and the target shape. The target should
remove branches, invalid states, duplication, or needless layers rather than
add speculative abstraction.
3. Remove dead code and redundant indirection before introducing the target
structure. For an API reshape, migrate all in-scope callers and delete the
obsolete path in the same verified wave.
4. Assign one bounded writer or implement at the root. A delegated writer uses
the active `code.feature-refactoring` route when configured. Use isolation when
available; otherwise serialize writes. Keep each step behavior-preserving and
rerun the pin after each independently meaningful slice.
5. The root reviews the diff and runs an equivalence check on the real artifact.
If behavior changes, split it into a separately requested feature or bug fix.
6. Keep the refactor only if the final code measurably lowers reader load.
7. Do not publish or open a pull request unless the user explicitly requested it.
Return the pinned contract, structural before and after, exact equivalence
proof, reader-load reduction, reverted experiments, and verification boundary.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!