Skip to content
Back to skills

Review Queue Triage

ASecurity

Audit _review/ items, classify by completion signals (status: resolved, REPO-ASSESSMENT + landing commit), auto-move resolved items to _reviewed/, leave uncertain items for user decision.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added October 1, 2026
ai-agentsbashgit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 1, 2026

npx -y skills add williamblair333/Uncle-J-s-Refinery --skill review-queue-triage --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Review Queue Triage?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Review Queue Triage
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/williamblair333-review-queue-triage/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/williamblair333-review-queue-triage)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: review-queue-triage
description: "Audit _review/ items, classify by completion signals (status: resolved, REPO-ASSESSMENT + landing commit), auto-move resolved items to _reviewed/, leave uncertain items for user decision."
---

## When to Use

Invoke when there are items in `_review/` that need triaging — whether after a batch drop, a competitive analysis, or bug-report filing. Also invoke at session start when `_review/` has been accumulating.

## Completion Signals

Auto-move to `_reviewed/` (no prompt needed) when **any** of these are present:

| Signal | Meaning |
|--------|---------|
| `status: resolved` anywhere in the file | Bug report or ticket closed |
| `REPO-ASSESSMENT.md` present **and** a landing commit closes the gap | Competitive analysis done and shipped |
| Explicit "merged", "closed", or "done" commit message referencing the item | PR/issue cycle complete |

Leave in `_review/` and report to user when:
- Source code drop with no assessment file
- Assessment exists but no corresponding landing commit
- Status field absent or ambiguous

## Steps

1. **Inventory** — list `_review/` top-level entries (files + directories).

2. **Classify each item**:
   - For `.md` files: read the file, look for `status:` field or equivalent resolution markers.
   - For directories: check for `REPO-ASSESSMENT.md`; if present, check git log for a commit that references the directory name or closes the gap.
   - For source code drops (no assessment): mark uncertain.

3. **Auto-move resolved items**:
   ```bash
   mv _review/<item> _reviewed/
   ```
   No user prompt. Do this for every item with a clear done signal.

4. **Report** — summarize what moved and what stayed, with one-line reason per item.

5. **Save feedback** if a new signal pattern was used — update the auto-move memory so the rule covers it next time.

## Example Classification Table

| Item | Signal Found | Action |
|------|-------------|--------|
| `fts5-corruption-bug.md` | `status: resolved` | Auto-move |
| `repair-orphaned-collections.md` | `status: resolved` | Auto-move |
| `ECC/` | `REPO-ASSESSMENT.md` + commit `ae41b6c` closed gaps | Leave (or move if user confirms) |
| `some-vendor-drop/` (source drop) | No assessment, no commit | Leave, report to user |

## Notes

- `_reviewed/` is gitignored — safe to move anything there without affecting CI.
- When in doubt between "resolved" and "uncertain," leave in place and surface to user. False negatives (leaving something resolved) are cheaper than false positives (moving something still in progress).

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.