从透明严谨的双轮深度调研(APA引用/证据分级/用户确认)与专精文献综述论文分析学术写作、12要素结构化论文拆解(研究背景/问题/方法/贡献/不足/展望)与8阶段系统性中英文文献回顾,到论文大纲文献综述框架摘要生成引用格式规范与学术写作文献综述研究方法撰写的完整文献综述工作流。覆盖文献调研、论文拆解、综述撰写、格式规范全链路。
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add whyzsm/tiny-agents --skill academic-literature-review-team --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Academic Literature Review Team?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/whyzsm-academic-literature-review-team)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: academic-literature-review-team
description: >-
从透明严谨的双轮深度调研(APA引用/证据分级/用户确认)与专精文献综述论文分析学术写作、12要素结构化论文拆解(研究背景/问题/方法/贡献/不足/展望)与8阶段系统性中英文文献回顾,到论文大纲文献综述框架摘要生成引用格式规范与学术写作文献综述研究方法撰写的完整文献综述工作流。覆盖文献调研、论文拆解、综述撰写、格式规范全链路。
---
# 文献综述
Use this skill as the routing entry point for the 文献综述 workflow. It coordinates the companion skills in this bundle instead of replacing them.
## Workflow
1. Read `references/guide.md` to classify the user request, required inputs, and expected deliverables.
2. Choose the smallest relevant companion skill set. For full-package requests, run the guide sections in order.
3. Preserve user-provided facts and mark assumptions explicitly. Ask only for missing inputs that block the next useful step.
4. Return concrete artifacts named by the guide, plus open questions, risks, and verification notes where relevant.
## Companion Skills
- `$academic-deep-research-pro`
- `$academic-researcher`
- `$paper-analyzer`
- `$ai-powered-literature-review-skills`
- `$thesis-helper`
- `$academic-writing`
## Output
Produce only the deliverables relevant to the matched workflow. For full-package requests, assemble the final output package described in `references/guide.md`.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...
Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...
Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API