Skip to content
Back to skills

Prove Sop

ASecurity

Build and audit a statistical or mathematical proof from proposition capture through skeleton selection, diagnosis, correction, optional empirical checking, and optional Lean reinsurance. Use when the user asks to prove or rigorously derive a proposition, a graph proposition lacks a verified proof, or a reviewer requires a theorem-side gate.

  • 8 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 6, 2026
ai-agentsgo

Works with

  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 6, 2026

npx -y skills add whenpoem/aiscientist --skill prove-sop --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Prove Sop?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Prove Sop
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/whenpoem-prove-sop-aiscientist/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/whenpoem-prove-sop-aiscientist)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: prove-sop
description: Build and audit a statistical or mathematical proof from proposition capture through skeleton selection, diagnosis, correction, optional empirical checking, and optional Lean reinsurance. Use when the user asks to prove or rigorously derive a proposition, a graph proposition lacks a verified proof, or a reviewer requires a theorem-side gate.
---

# Prove SOP

Treat this skill as a router. Read [references/proof-loop.md](references/proof-loop.md)
before starting a new proof or resuming an incomplete proof loop.

## Route the request

1. Identify the proposition, assumptions, requested rigor, and desired output.
2. Look up related proof failures with
   `mcp__memory__match_signatures(..., domain="proof")` before drafting.
3. Register the proposition if it is not already in the shared graph.
4. Follow the proof loop reference through skeleton selection, draft diagnosis,
   correction, and review.
5. Add an empirical companion only when a constant or premise needs data.
6. Use Lean only as optional reinsurance for a small, closed, formalization-ready
   claim; a missing Lean tool or failed attempt does not invalidate a sound
   natural-language proof.

## Required boundaries

- Compare only candidates of the same graph kind.
- Treat BT intervals as uncalibrated approximate posterior summaries. Never call
  their separation a significance test or use it as the sole stopping rule.
- `diagnose_snippet` is read-only; persist each judgment explicitly with
  `register_diagnosis`.
- Corrected drafts need a new segmentation and diagnostic manifest. Preserve old
  manifests as audit history.
- Check wall-clock budget before a Lean attempt expected to take at least five
  minutes, and record actual use afterward.
- If the optional `prover` or `budgeter` agent is unavailable, perform the same
  checks inline and report that the specialized agent surface was absent.

## Completion

Finish only when the proposition and final draft are identifiable, the latest
diagnostic manifest is empty or every remaining limitation is explicit, the
manuscript states Lean verification status honestly, and any empirical companion
has passed its own preregistration and provenance gates.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.2 KB
  • references/proof-loop.md3.3 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.