**Send the architecture diagram today — it's the one blocker on Fernway's side — and escalate the two blockers that have been sitting on Aldergate's side for months, since the build price (R-07) can't be fixed until the security review closes.** Aldergate's compliance office answered most of the gate-review questions on 12 May, but declined the one that matters most for pricing — data storage, encryption and logging (Q7) — until Fernway supplies an architecture diagram. At the 9 July sync Fer...
Scanned 9/19/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add welltraum/minto --skill raw --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Raw?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/welltraum-raw-d0f91c95)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
**Send the architecture diagram today — it's the one blocker on Fernway's side — and escalate the two blockers that have been sitting on Aldergate's side for months, since the build price (R-07) can't be fixed until the security review closes.**
Aldergate's compliance office answered most of the gate-review questions on 12 May, but declined the one that matters most for pricing — data storage, encryption and logging (Q7) — until Fernway supplies an architecture diagram. At the 9 July sync Fernway agreed to send that diagram before the next sync; a draft has existed since 11 August but hasn't gone out (`gate-review.xlsx` Q7; `sync-0709.md`; `risk register R-14`). Send it now — it's the only compliance blocker that depends on Fernway, and it unlocks the last unanswered question.
**Already settled, no action needed:**
- A security review before production is mandatory; whether a pen-test is also required gets decided *during* that review, not before (`gate-review.xlsx` Q1).
- Aldergate's internal hardening framework exists but doesn't substitute for the review (Q2); dependency approval is likewise folded into the review, with no fixed turnaround (Q4, Q5).
- Working from Ireland is cleared (Q6).
**Stuck on Aldergate, and now overdue — push, don't wait:**
- The approved-package list was promised by D. Mercer on 12 May and again by R. Whitcombe on 9 July, with no date either time; it's now open 98 days and blocks dependency sign-off (`gate-review.xlsx` Q3; `sync-0709.md`; `R-11`).
- Real ownership is unclear: S. Okafor was named as the information-security owner on 9 July but has never joined a joint meeting — Whitcombe just relays questions. Ask for direct access to Okafor when you send the diagram, so the list and the Q7 follow-up don't route through a third party again.
**One gap nobody has raised:** two Fernway engineers are based in Lisbon; this was mentioned in the 9 July sync and Aldergate never responded. The location clearance on file only covers Ireland (`gate-review.xlsx` Q6; `sync-0709.md`). Worth putting in writing as its own question rather than leaving it as an unanswered aside.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!