**Legend** | Marker | Meaning | |---|---| | `▲` | top / answer | | `●` | first‑level group | | `⚠` | violation (mixed kinds, unexplainable order, false grouping) | | `↑` | conclusion buried lower than it belongs | | `⇄` | wrong order type here | | `⊗` | overlap (ME broken) | | `⊕` | gap (CE broken) | | `✂` | cut / move to appendix | **Annotated opening** ``` ▲⚠ This memorandum describes how project teams identify and deliver significant profit improvements. ⚠ It is organized in six sections: ...
Scanned 9/19/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add welltraum/minto --skill raw --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Raw?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/welltraum-raw-b19113f6)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
**Legend**
| Marker | Meaning |
|---|---|
| `▲` | top / answer |
| `●` | first‑level group |
| `⚠` | violation (mixed kinds, unexplainable order, false grouping) |
| `↑` | conclusion buried lower than it belongs |
| `⇄` | wrong order type here |
| `⊗` | overlap (ME broken) |
| `⊕` | gap (CE broken) |
| `✂` | cut / move to appendix |
**Annotated opening**
```
▲⚠ This memorandum describes how project teams identify and deliver significant profit improvements.
⚠ It is organized in six sections:
● Background
● Principles of the project‑team approach
● Definition of project work
● Organization of the program
● Distinctive benefits and results
● Conditions required for success
```
**Findings**
| Location | Violation | Suggested fix |
|---|---|---|
| Top line | Does not answer a reader’s question (topic label, not answer) | Rewrite as an answer‑first statement that directly answers the implied decision/question. |
| First two sentences | Missing SCQ intro (no Situation, Complication, Question) | Add a short SCQ story that sets the common ground and the need for action. |
| List of sections | Presented as flat TOC, not a hierarchical pyramid | Re‑organize into a pyramid: top answer → 3‑4 same‑kind groups → supporting details. |
| Order of sections | No explicit ordering principle disclosed | State the order type (e.g., “structure”) and justify the sequence. |
| Overall display | Hierarchy not visible; headings/indentation absent | Use headings or indentation (or a mermaid diagram) to make the pyramid instantly readable. |
**Score (0–2 per axis, max 10)**
- Top: **0**
- Same‑kind groups: **2**
- Order: **0**
- MECE: **2**
- Display: **0**
**Total:** **4 / 10** (baseline workable)
**Top three fixes to improve the memo**
1. Replace the opening sentence with an answer‑first line that answers the reader’s decision question.
2. Insert a concise SCQ intro (Situation → Complication → Question) before the answer.
3. Restructure the six sections into a clear pyramid (top answer → 3‑4 same‑kind groups → supports) and display it with headings or a diagram.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!