Legend: ▲ answer · ⚠ structural violation · ⇄ unexplained order · ⊗ overlap · ⊕ gap ```text ⚠ This memorandum describes how project teams identify and deliver significant profit improvements. [▲ The opening states a topic and purpose, not an answer to the reader’s decision question.] It is organized in six sections: ⚠ Background ⚠ Principles of the project-team approach ⚠ Definition of project work ⚠ Organization of the program ⚠ Distinctive benefits and results [⊗ “benefits” and “results” ma...
Scanned 9/19/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add welltraum/minto --skill raw --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Raw?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/welltraum-raw-affecf8f)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
Legend: ▲ answer · ⚠ structural violation · ⇄ unexplained order · ⊗ overlap · ⊕ gap
```text
⚠ This memorandum describes how project teams identify and deliver significant
profit improvements. [▲ The opening states a topic and purpose, not an answer to
the reader’s decision question.] It is organized in six sections:
⚠ Background
⚠ Principles of the project-team approach
⚠ Definition of project work
⚠ Organization of the program
⚠ Distinctive benefits and results [⊗ “benefits” and “results” may overlap]
⚠ Conditions required for success
⇄ [The sequence of these headings has no stated ordering principle.]
```
| Location | Violation | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Opening sentence | No answer in the visible opening; it only announces the topic. | State the conclusion that answers the reader’s question before listing support. |
| Six headings | Mixed kinds: context, principles, definition, organizational design, outcomes, and conditions. | Group headings by one kind that answers the reader’s question. |
| “Distinctive benefits and results” | Potential overlap within one heading. | Distinguish the two terms or use one defined category. |
| Heading sequence | No visible time, structure, ranking, deduction, or induction order. | Select and signal an order appropriate to the argument. |
| Overall setout | Flat contents list does not show how the sections support one controlling idea. | Make the hierarchy and parent-child logic visible. |
| Completeness | ⊕ The visible setout cannot demonstrate a complete explanation of how improvements are identified and delivered; the body is unavailable. | Verify coverage against the intended reader question once the body is available. |
Score: **1/10 — not structured yet**
| Axis | Score |
|---|---:|
| Top | 0 |
| Same-kind groups | 0 |
| Order | 0 |
| MECE | 0 |
| Display | 1 |
Top three fixes:
1. Replace the topic-led opening with a single answer to the reader’s question.
2. Rebuild the six headings into 3–4 same-kind supporting groups.
3. Order those groups by an explicit logical principle and display their hierarchy.Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!