**Legend** ▲ top / answer · ● first-level group · ○ supporting detail · ⚠ violation · ↑ conclusion buried lower than it belongs · ⇄ wrong order type here · ⊗ overlap (ME broken) · ⊕ gap (CE broken) · ✂ cut, or move to an appendix **Annotated opening** ```text ⊕ This memorandum describes how project teams identify and deliver significant profit improvements. [⚠ Topic label / statement of purpose; no answer or SCQ question visible.] It is organized in six sections: [✂ Contents statement; not an...
Scanned 9/19/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add welltraum/minto --skill raw --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Raw?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/welltraum-raw-a80db388)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
**Legend**
▲ top / answer · ● first-level group · ○ supporting detail · ⚠ violation · ↑ conclusion buried lower than it belongs · ⇄ wrong order type here · ⊗ overlap (ME broken) · ⊕ gap (CE broken) · ✂ cut, or move to an appendix
**Annotated opening**
```text
⊕ This memorandum describes how project teams identify and deliver significant
profit improvements. [⚠ Topic label / statement of purpose; no answer or SCQ question visible.] It is organized in six sections: [✂ Contents statement; not an answer-first skeleton]
● ⊕ Background [⚠ generic context label; no support visible]
● ⊕ Principles of the project-team approach [⚠ mixed kind; boundary with “Definition” unclear]
● ⊕ Definition of project work [⚠ mixed kind; no support visible]
● ⊕ Organization of the program [⚠ mixed kind; no support visible]
● ⊕ Distinctive benefits and results [⚠ compound heading; payoff/outcome, not same kind as preceding headings]
● ⊕ Conditions required for success [⇄ prerequisite appears after benefits; no support visible]
```
**Findings**
| Location | Violation | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| First sentence | Top is a topic label, not an answer to a reader question | Make the first line a one-sentence answer |
| Opening | No Situation, Complication, Question, or Answer is visible | Add a brief SCQ story ending in a literal question and answer |
| First sentence vs section list | Parent does not summarize children: “how” is promised, but the list includes background, benefits, and conditions | Make the top a true generalization of the main groups |
| Six-section list | Mixed kinds / false grouping: context, principles, definition, organization, outcomes, requirements | Recast as 3–4 same-kind claims, or demote the list to a contents page |
| Every heading | No supporting detail is visible under any heading | Add a claim under each heading that supports the top, or remove unsupported headings |
| Principles / Definition / Organization / Conditions | Boundaries are unclear and may overlap | Define non-overlapping scope for each heading |
| “Conditions required for success” | Order is not explicable; a prerequisite follows benefits/results | Reorder by time, logic, or ranking, or state the ordering principle |
**Score**
| Axis | Score |
|---|---:|
| Top | 0 |
| Same-kind groups | 0 |
| Order | 1 |
| MECE | 1 |
| Display | 1 |
| **Total** | **3/10 — not structured yet** |
**Three highest-value fixes**
1. Replace the first sentence with a one-sentence answer that summarizes the main groups.
2. Add a visible SCQ question and answer before the section list.
3. Recast the six headings into 3–4 same-kind groups with visible support.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!