Raw

**Legend**  
`▲` top / answer `●` first‑level group `○` supporting detail `⚠` violation (mixed kinds, unexplainable order, false grouping) `↑` buried conclusion `⇄` wrong order type `⊗` overlap (ME broken) `⊕` gap (CE broken) `✂` cut / move to appendix  

```
⚠ This memorandum describes how project teams identify and deliver significant profit improvements. It is organized in six sections:

● Background
● Principles of the project‑team approach
● Definition of project work
● Organization of the program
● Distinctive benefits and results
● Conditions required for success
```

**Findings**

| Location | Violation | Fix |
|----------|-----------|-----|
| Line 1 (top sentence) | Top does not answer a reader’s question (topic label, no answer) | Replace with a one‑sentence answer to the implied decision question |
| Line 1 (top sentence) | Top does not summarize the six sections (vertical gap) | Rewrite top to summarize the six headings or make it the answer |
| Entire opening | Missing SCQ intro (no Situation → Complication → Question) | Add a brief SCQ paragraph before the list of sections |

**Score (0–2 per axis, max 10)**  

| Axis | Score |
|------|-------|
| Top | 0 |
| Same‑kind groups | 2 |
| Order | 1 |
| MECE | 1 |
| Display | 1 |
| **Total** | **5** (baseline workable) |

**Top‑3 fixes that buy the most**

1. Replace the opening line with a clear answer to the reader’s decision question.  
2. Insert a short SCQ intro (Situation → Complication → Question) to frame the memo.  
3. Ensure the top line summarizes the six sections, linking it to the answer.