Skip to content
Back to skills

Phasing

ASecurity

Group slices into risk-optimized phases with timeline generation

  • 342 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 1, 2026
toolsc#apidatabasefrontendbackend

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 1, 2026

npx -y skills add WellApp-ai/Well --skill phasing --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Phasing?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Phasing
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/wellapp-ai-phasing/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/wellapp-ai-phasing)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: phasing
description: Group slices into risk-optimized phases with timeline generation
---

# Phasing Skill

Group implementation slices into phases based on combined risk and GTM scores, then generate a visual timeline.

## When to Use

- During Ask mode Phase 2 (CONVERGE), after dependency-mapping and gtm-alignment
- Before transitioning to Plan mode
- To generate the final delivery timeline

## Instructions

### Phase 1: Gather Scores

Collect scores from previous skills:

| Slice | Risk Score | GTM Score |
|-------|------------|-----------|
| [From dependency-mapping] | [N] | [From gtm-alignment] |

### Phase 2: Calculate Combined Score

```
Final Priority Score = Risk - (GTM x 0.5)

Lower score = ships earlier
```

| Slice | Risk | GTM | Final | Rank |
|-------|------|-----|-------|------|
| #2.2 Invite Flow | 7 | 8 | 3.0 | 1 |
| #1.1 Switcher | 1 | 4 | -1.0 | 2 |
| #1.2 Members UI | 4 | 3 | 2.5 | 3 |

### Phase 3: Group into Phases

Apply grouping rules:

| Phase | Criteria | Typical Contents |
|-------|----------|------------------|
| Phase 1 | P1 + Lowest risk + Serves T1 | FE-only components, quick wins |
| Phase 2 | P2 + Dependencies on P1 complete | FE+BE integration, non-breaking |
| Phase 3 | P3/P4 + Highest risk | Contract changes, data model |

**Grouping Constraints:**
- Respect dependency order (check DSM matrix from dependency-mapping)
- Each phase should be independently deployable
- Each phase should serve at least one complete persona tier
- Keep phases to 3-5 days when possible

### Phase 4: Generate Timeline (ASCII)

Use ASCII format grouped by stack. Show only dependencies with arrows. No dates or effort estimates.

**ASCII Timeline Format:**

```
TIMELINE: [Feature Name]
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

FRONTEND
├── [Slice name]
├── [Slice name] ───────────────┐
├── [Slice name] ───────────────┼──┐
└── [Slice name] ───────────────┘  │
                                   │
BACKEND                            │
└── [Slice name] ◄─────────────────┘
         │
         ▼
INFRASTRUCTURE
└── [Slice name]
         │
         ▼
INTEGRATION
├── [Slice name]
└── [Slice name]

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
LEGEND:
├── = parallel (no dependency)
──► = dependency (must complete before)
```

**Stack Grouping Rules:**

| Section | Contains |
|---------|----------|
| Frontend | Components, pages, client-side logic, Storybook |
| Backend | API routes, middleware, services, database |
| Infrastructure | DNS, deployment, environment config |
| Integration | Cross-cutting features, E2E flows |

**Dependency Notation:**
- `├──` items in same section run in parallel
- `──►` or `◄──` arrows show blocking dependencies
- `│` and `▼` show sequential flow between stacks

### Phase 6: Document Checkpoints

| Phase End | Validation | Who Validates |
|-----------|------------|---------------|
| Phase 1 | Storybook review, design QA | Design team |
| Phase 2 | E2E on staging, API tests pass | QA team |
| Phase 3 | Production deploy, monitoring | Ops team |

## Output Format

Output an **executive summary** (like DIVERGE), then the **ASCII timeline**. Do NOT show QA Contract details or Priority Matrix.

```markdown
## Value Analysis Complete

### Executive Summary

| Phase | Status | Key Output |
|-------|--------|------------|
| Scope | ✓ | Full ([N] validated wireframes from Phase 1) |
| State Machines | ✓ | [N] components, [N] states, [N] transitions |
| QA Contract | ✓ | [N] Gherkin (G#1-N), [N] acceptance (AC#1-N) |
| Dependencies | ✓ | [N] slices, [N] blockers, DSM matrix built |
| Design Reuse | ✓ | [N] existing components leveraged |
| Personas (Notion) | ✓ | Fetched [N] from DB, T1: [name], T2: [name] |
| GTM Strategy (Notion) | ✓ | Positioning: "[excerpt...]" |
| Persona Coverage | ✓ | Phase 1 serves [Tier], Phase 2 serves [Tiers] |
| Phasing | ✓ | [N] phases, [N] commits total |

### Proposed Timeline

[ASCII timeline with stacks and dependency arrows - no dates/effort]

### Checkpoints

| Phase | Validation | Owner |
|-------|------------|-------|
| 1 | [Validation] | [Team] |
| 2 | [Validation] | [Team] |
| 3 | [Validation] | [Team] |
```

## Invocation

Invoke manually with "use phasing skill" or follow Ask mode Phase 2 (CONVERGE) which references this skill.

## Related Skills

- `dependency-mapping` - Provides risk scores
- `gtm-alignment` - Provides GTM scores

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.