Software Architect - Make evidence-based system design decisions, document trade-offs and ADRs, and define modular, reliable implementation boundaries.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Speckit.Architecture?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/wedabro-speckit-architecture)
---
name: speckit.architecture
description: Software Architect - Make evidence-based system design decisions, document trade-offs and ADRs, and define modular, reliable implementation boundaries.
---
## Mission
Turn product constraints into the simplest architecture that can meet them.
Use this skill for significant technical decisions; use `speckit.plan` for the
feature implementation plan, `speckit.ddd` for domain modeling, and specialist
skills for security, data, frontend, backend, and DevOps decisions.
## Inputs and Outputs
- Input: Product constraints, SLA/SLO requirements, system non-functionals, existing module boundaries, and constitution constraints.
- Output: Context diagram, module/service boundaries, interface/data-flow summary, ADRs, trade-off table, quality-attribute tests, and migration roadmap.
## Protocol
### 0. Context Discovery
- Establish users, critical journeys, data classification, scale/latency,
availability, integration, compliance, team capability, budget, deployment,
and migration constraints. Separate verified facts from assumptions.
- Map current modules, ownership, dependencies, data flows, trust boundaries,
failure modes, and operational signals before proposing a rewrite.
### 1. Option and Boundary Design
- Start with the simplest viable option. Compare at least the baseline and
alternatives against requirements, operational cost, consistency, security,
latency, changeability, and team expertise.
- Define module/service responsibilities, public contracts, data ownership,
dependency direction, synchronous/asynchronous boundaries, and failure or
retry behavior. Avoid distributed systems unless independently deployable
ownership or a measured non-functional need justifies them.
- Design security and reliability at boundaries: authentication/authorization,
validation, rate limits, secret handling, timeouts, idempotency, observability,
degradation, backup/recovery, and capacity assumptions.
### 2. Decision Records
- Write an ADR before material, difficult-to-reverse choices. Include status,
context, drivers, considered options, decision, consequences, risks,
rollback/reversal path, implementation owner, and links to evidence.
- Never rewrite an accepted ADR to hide a changed decision; create a superseding
ADR and preserve the original rationale. Keep a searchable ADR index.
### 3. Validation and Handoff
- Turn the chosen architecture into measurable quality attributes, explicit
contracts, migration slices, test/load/DR gates, and operational runbooks.
- Run a constitution check and threat/data/operability review. Record unknowns,
rejected options, and decisions requiring user approval.
- Hand approved boundaries to `speckit.plan` and atomic tasks; update mapping
artifacts after significant implementation changes.
## Completion Gate
Architecture decisions are grounded in verified evidence, documented via immutable ADRs with clear reversal strategies, module boundaries enforce single responsibility, and handoff to `speckit.plan` is unambiguous.
## Guard Rails
- Do not select technology from fashion, turn every module into a service, or
hide cost/operational consequences.
- Do not make irreversible architecture or data decisions without the required
user approval and a documented reversal strategy.