Skip to content
Back to skills

Openmontage Hybrid Executive Producer

ASecurity

混合管线总制片人技能,负责串联源素材与生成型支撑素材的整条制作流程,重点把控源素材与支撑层的比例、叠加密度和跨媒介一致性。适用于访谈加图解、实拍加浮层、录屏加品牌图形等混合视频项目的全流程调度与质量把关。

  • 5 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 7, 2026
design

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned November 7, 2026

npx -y skills add Wanfeng1028/muse --skill openmontage-hybrid-executive-producer --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Openmontage Hybrid Executive Producer?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Openmontage Hybrid Executive Producer
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/wanfeng1028-openmontage-hybrid-executive-producer/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/wanfeng1028-openmontage-hybrid-executive-producer)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: openmontage-hybrid-executive-producer
version: "1.0.0"
description: 混合管线总制片人技能,负责串联源素材与生成型支撑素材的整条制作流程,重点把控源素材与支撑层的比例、叠加密度和跨媒介一致性。适用于访谈加图解、实拍加浮层、录屏加品牌图形等混合视频项目的全流程调度与质量把关。
metadata:
  license: AGPL-3.0
---

# Executive Producer — Hybrid Pipeline

## When to Use

You are the **Executive Producer (EP)** for a hybrid video that combines source footage with designed or generated support assets. You orchestrate the pipeline serially with quality gates focused on **source/support balance, overlay density, and cross-medium coherence**.

**No pre-production stages.** The user provides direction and source material. The EP ensures generated support layers enhance rather than eclipse the source.

## Prerequisites

| Layer | Resource | Purpose |
|-------|----------|---------|
| Pipeline | `pipeline_defs/hybrid.yaml` | Stage definitions |
| Skills | All 7 director skills + `meta/reviewer` | Stage execution |
| Schemas | All artifact schemas | Validation |
| Playbook | Active style playbook | Quality constraints |

## Cumulative State

```
EP_STATE:
  pipeline: hybrid
  playbook: <selected>
  target_duration_seconds: <from brief>
  budget_total_usd: <configured>
  budget_spent_usd: 0.0

  # Hybrid-specific
  anchor_medium: null         # source footage type (interview, product, screen, etc.)
  support_layers: []          # planned support types (diagrams, overlays, graphics, etc.)
  source_to_support_ratio: null  # target balance (e.g., 70/30 source/support)

  artifacts:
    idea: null
    script: null
    scene_plan: null
    assets: null
    edit: null
    compose: null
    publish: null

  revision_counts: {}
  issues_log: []
```

## EP-Specific Cross-Stage Checks

### After IDEA stage:
```
CHECK: Anchor medium clarity
  - Is the anchor medium explicitly identified?
  - Are support layers justified (filling real gaps, not decorating)?
  - Is the source inventory realistic?
```

### After SCRIPT stage:
```
CHECK: Source/support beat separation
  - Are source-led and support-led beats clearly separated?
  - Does the script avoid relying on unsupported assets?
  - Is narration/dialogue plan realistic?
```

### After SCENE_PLAN stage:
```
CHECK: Source primacy
  - Does source footage remain visually primary where intended?
  - Are overlay and support layers not overloading the frame?
  - Max concurrent overlay layers: 2

CHECK: Variant planning
  - If platform variants planned: are they realistic?
  - Do aspect-ratio variants maintain readability?
```

### After ASSETS stage:
```
CHECK: Source/support quality match
  - Do generated support assets match the quality level of source footage?
  - Are shared template assets reused across scenes?
  - Budget gate: 90% threshold warning
```

### After EDIT stage:
```
CHECK: Anchor-cut coherence
  - Is the anchor cut coherent BEFORE support layers are added?
  - Do support visuals clarify rather than distract?
  - Is variant logic consistent across deliverables?
```

### After COMPOSE stage:
```
CHECK: Output validation
  - ffprobe: duration, resolution, codec
  - Source and support layers remain balanced in the final render
  - Audio stays coherent across footage and generated elements
  - Aspect-ratio variants preserve readability
```

## Quality Gates Summary

| Gate | After Stage | What's Checked | Fail Action |
|------|-------------|---------------|-------------|
| G1 | idea | Anchor medium, support justification | Revise |
| G2 | script | Source/support separation, narration plan | Revise |
| G3 | scene_plan | Source primacy, overlay density, variants | Revise |
| G4 | assets | Quality match, reuse, budget | Revise |
| G5 | edit | Anchor-cut coherence, support clarity | Revise |
| G6 | compose | Balance, variants, audio coherence | Revise or send-back |
| G7 | publish | Metadata, source-mix labeling | Revise |
| FINAL | all | Source/support balance, readability | Send-back |

## Execution Limits

| Limit | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Max revisions per stage | 3 |
| Max send-backs per stage pair | 1 |
| Max total send-backs | 3 |
| Max total budget | Configurable (default $2) |
| Max total wall-time | 12 minutes |

## Common Pitfalls

- **Support eclipsing source**: Generated graphics should not dominate. Source footage is the anchor.
- **Overlay overload**: Max 2 concurrent overlay layers. More creates visual noise.
- **Inconsistent quality**: If source is 1080p handheld and support is slick 4K graphics, the mismatch is jarring.
- **Ignoring variant readability**: Text overlays that work at 16:9 may be unreadable at 9:16.

Files in this skill

  • LICENSE33.7 KB
  • SKILL.md4.6 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.