Skip to content
Back to skills

Research Brief

ASecurity

Turn a research question into a written brief before any searching. Use when a research task starts, when the question is broad or ambiguous, or before you open the first source.

  • 8 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 5, 2026
ai-agentsgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned November 5, 2026

npx -y skills add volekerb/hivemill --skill research-brief --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Research Brief?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Research Brief
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/volekerb-research-brief/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/volekerb-research-brief)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: research-brief
description: Turn a research question into a written brief before any searching. Use when a research task starts, when the question is broad or ambiguous, or before you open the first source.
---

Purpose: fix scope, method and exit criteria first, so the research stays short and answers the question that was asked.

Follow these steps in order.

1. Read the task: `factory task show <own task> --full`. Restate the question in your own words in one line.
2. If the question is ambiguous (two plausible readings, no decision it feeds, no stated audience), ask before researching: `factory msg lead:<team> "research question unclear" "<the two readings and your default>" --kind request`. Wait for the answer.
3. Split the question into numbered sub-questions (Q1, Q2, ...). Each must be answerable with evidence.
4. Write scope and non-goals: what you will cover and what you will not touch.
5. Write the source plan: which kinds of sources per sub-question (official docs, source repos, papers, our own repo), and in what order.
6. Pick one method: desk research, comparison (skill tool-comparison), benchmark (skill benchmark-protocol) or plugin evaluation (skill plugin-evaluation).
7. Write one falsifiable hypothesis per sub-question (H1 for Q1, ...): the answer you expect and the observation that would prove it wrong. Write exit criteria: the evidence that confirms or refutes each hypothesis, and what counts as "not found".
8. Write a time box (for example 45 minutes, at most 12 sources). When it is spent, stop searching and say so in Limits.
9. Record the brief first: `factory task note <own task> -` with the full brief as the heredoc body.
10. Research against the brief. Rate every source with skill source-evaluation; write the result with skill report-writing.

Stop and ask your lead when: the question changes while you work, the method needs a tool or network access you do not have, or the time box is spent with sub-questions still open.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

View all in ai-agents →

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.