Skip to content
Back to skills

Acceptance Template

ASecurity

Make every acceptance item a runnable command with an expected result, quote wording exactly, and add a RISKS section. Use when writing or amending a task's spec or acceptance.

  • 8 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 5, 2026
ai-agentspythongogit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned November 5, 2026

npx -y skills add volekerb/hivemill --skill acceptance-template --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Acceptance Template?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Acceptance Template
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/volekerb-acceptance-template/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/volekerb-acceptance-template)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: acceptance-template
description: Make every acceptance item a runnable command with an expected result, quote wording exactly, and add a RISKS section. Use when writing or amending a task's spec or acceptance.
---

# Acceptance template

Prose acceptance ("works", "is documented") makes QA guess. Each rule below adds a requirement; none loosens plan-quality.

A1 Every acceptance item is `N. <claim> - <runnable command> -> <expected result>`; the result is an exit code, an exact output line, a count, or "empty". A judgement item names the exact file:line or diff hunk to read.
   Good: `3. tests pass - python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -p test_x.py -> exit 0, "OK"`. Bad: `3. tests pass`.

A2 Wording that must survive (rule text, messages, markers) is quoted exactly and checked with `grep -nF '<exact text>' <file>`.
   Good: `grep -nF 'never call the advisor tool' roles/x.md` -> one hit. Bad: "the advisor rule is kept".

A3 "Additions only" or "no other line changes" is a grep: `git diff origin/main -- <file> | grep '^-' | grep -v '^--- a/'` -> empty.
   Bad: "do not change other lines".

A4 Byte and line caps are `wc -c` / `wc -l` commands with the number. A role prompt delta states the headroom (plan-quality P8).
   Good: `wc -c < roles/pm.md` -> at most 4606 (headroom 1362). Bad: "keep the prompt short".

A5 Every spec has a `RISKS:` section: each risk, how it is mitigated, and which acceptance item tests it. A spec without RISKS is not ready.
   Good: `RISKS: (r1) prompt over budget -> item 2 measures it`. Bad: "RISKS: none".

A6 Guards: one blocked and one allowed case through the real entry point (see plan-quality P2; do not restate it), plus a C4 item: remove the fix -> the new test fails.
   Good: `7. remove the fix in a scratch copy, run the test -> FAIL`. Bad: "guard is tested".

## Skeleton (copy, fill, delete what does not apply)

Spec headings:
```
WHY:
BUILD:
CONSUMERS (P1):
GATE NOT WEAKENED:
RISKS:
FILES:
Rules:
```

Acceptance lines:
```
1. <claim> - <command> -> <expected result>
2. <claim> - grep -nF '<exact text>' <file> -> one hit
3. additions only - git diff origin/main -- <file> | grep '^-' | grep -v '^--- a/' -> empty
4. cap - wc -c < <file> -> at most <N>
```

Mandatory coder Rules line, verbatim:

"merge origin/main before opening or updating the PR; the merge-tree test-count rule (worker-brief skill, item 3), verbatim; a denied command stays denied in every form - stop and report; run the coder-skills:pre-pr-check skill before in_review; PR body needs `## Acceptance walk`; never call the 'advisor' tool."

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

View all in ai-agents →

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.