Use when deciding whether to spawn subagents — explicit rules for when delegation pays off and when direct work is faster. Opus 4.8 under-delegates by default; these rules correct that.
Scanned 8/30/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add vitaliikapliuk/modelharness --skill delegation-triggers --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Delegation Triggers?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vitaliikapliuk-delegation-triggers)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: delegation-triggers
description: Use when deciding whether to spawn subagents — explicit rules for when delegation pays off and when direct work is faster. Opus 4.8 under-delegates by default; these rules correct that.
---
# Delegation Triggers
Opus 4.8 is documented to under-reach for subagents. Apply these rules instead of
intuition.
## Delegate (spawn subagents, in parallel where independent) when:
- Work fans out across **independent items**: reading/searching many files, auditing
several modules, running several independent investigations.
- You need a **broad search** where only the conclusion matters (use a read-only
explore subagent; you keep the answer, not the file dumps).
- You need **fresh-context verification** of your own work (see verification-loop).
- Two or more workstreams have **no shared state** and no ordering dependency — launch
them in one message so they run concurrently.
## Work directly when:
- A single file read or a known-location lookup would answer the question.
- Edits are sequential and each depends on the previous result.
- The task is small enough that subagent setup costs more than it saves.
## How
- Give each subagent a self-contained brief: goal, exact scope, what to return.
- Don't duplicate a delegated search yourself — wait for the result.
- Prefer asynchronous delegation: keep working on the main thread while subagents run;
intervene only if one goes off track.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
**Complete production-ready guide for Google Gemini embeddings API** This skill provides comprehensive coverage of the `gemini-embedding-001` model for generating text embeddings, including SDK usage, REST API patterns, batch processing, RAG integration with Cloudflare Vectorize, and advanced use cases like semantic search and document clustering. ---
Interview, source-challenge, verify, save, and ADR-gate fuzzy coding requests into Codex-ready implementation specs. Use when a feature, bugfix, refactor, migration, repo-wide change, or architecture task needs user-verified requirements, source-backed decisions, durable architecture decisions, acceptance criteria, validation commands, rollout notes, saved spec/ADR files, and a Codex execution prompt. Do not use when already fully specified or when the user wants direct implementation now.
Use when a repo needs CodeGraph plus ast-grep for Codex MCP setup, exploration, impact analysis, structural search, or safe refactor planning.