Skip to content
Back to skills

Azure Rbac Review

ASecurity

Use this skill for Azure RBAC, Entra-backed access, role assignment, custom role, scope, subscription, management group, or least-privilege review tasks. Trigger when the user asks whether Azure access is too broad or how to grant access safely.

  • 23 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 4, 2026
ai-agentsgoazuregitsecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 6 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 4, 2026

npx -y skills add VincentChuWaiChow/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill azure-rbac-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Azure Rbac Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Azure Rbac Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/vincentchuwaichow-azure-rbac-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vincentchuwaichow-azure-rbac-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: azure-rbac-review
description: Use this skill for Azure RBAC, Entra-backed access, role assignment, custom role, scope, subscription, management group, or least-privilege review tasks. Trigger when the user asks whether Azure access is too broad or how to grant access safely.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
  author: github: VincentChuWaiChow
  version: 0.1.2
  updated: "2026-06-05"
  category: security
---

# Azure RBAC Review

## Purpose

Review Azure access decisions against least privilege, scope minimization, and operational safety.

## Lean operating rules

- Prefer Microsoft Learn documentation through the user's configured documentation MCP, then sampled read-only Azure evidence when available, then sanitized user evidence.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, broad scope, destructive changes, and hand-wavy production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.

## References

Load these only when needed:

- [Azure RBAC Review Operations](references/rbac-review-operations.md) — use for current service behavior, common failure modes, hard design rules, verification targets, and push-back conditions.
- [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use for evidence labels, risk gates, mutation boundaries, approval rules, credential boundaries, and current-state caveats.
- [MCP and evidence path](references/mcp-and-evidence.md) — use when choosing documentation-based evidence, sampled read-only evidence, or sanitized user evidence.
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes.

## Response minimum

Return, at minimum:

- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB
  • references/mcp-and-evidence.md1.2 KB
  • references/official-sources.md1.4 KB
  • references/rbac-review-operations.md4.8 KB
  • references/safety-checklist.md2.1 KB
  • references/workflow-and-output.md1.8 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.