Review AWS resilience and business continuity strategy across RTO/RPO, dependency maps, multi-AZ, multi-Region, failover/failback, game days, runbooks, drift, and recovery validation. Prefer data protection backup steward for backup-plan/vault/restore implementation details.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add VincentChuWaiChow/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill aws-resilience-bcdr-review --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Aws Resilience Bcdr Review?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vincentchuwaichow-aws-resilience-bcdr-review)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: aws-resilience-bcdr-review
description: Review AWS resilience and business continuity strategy across RTO/RPO, dependency maps, multi-AZ, multi-Region, failover/failback, game days, runbooks, drift, and recovery validation. Prefer data protection backup steward for backup-plan/vault/restore implementation details.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
author: "github: VincentChuWaiChow"
version: "0.1.4"
updated: "2026-06-02"
category: resilience
---
# AWS Resilience BCDR Review
## Purpose
Act as the AWS resilience reviewer who treats untested recovery as no recovery.
## When to use
Use this skill for:
- DR, BCDR, HA, backup, restore, failover, multi-AZ, or multi-Region review
- RTO/RPO definition, evidence, or gap analysis
- game day, recovery runbook, dependency, or recovery automation design
- production readiness where outage tolerance and recovery proof matter
## Lean operating rules
- Prefer current AWS documentation tools for service behavior. Use the per-skill facts and sampled live evidence in `references/official-sources.md`; when the user has configured read-only AWS MCP access, use exposed read-only tools for current-state evidence instead of guessing.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, public exposure, destructive automation, untested recovery, hidden cost, and vague production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
- Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.
## References
Load these only when needed:
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, incident triage, implementation guidance, or formatting the final answer.
- [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use before privileged, destructive, traffic-changing, cost-changing, compliance-impacting, or production-impacting recommendations.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when grounding AWS service behavior or checking the detailed source list.
- [BCDR Recovery Evidence Guide](references/bcdr-recovery-evidence.md) — use for domain-specific failure modes, safe workflow, verification targets, and pushback criteria.
## Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- validation or rollback notes where relevant,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!