Review AWS KMS and Secrets Manager lifecycle posture across key policies, grants, rotation, multi-Region keys, imported key material, aliases, secret rotation, replication, caching, endpoint conditions, recovery, and break-glass access. Prefer this for cryptography/secret lifecycle; prefer IAM skill for general permissions review.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add VincentChuWaiChow/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill aws-kms-secrets-lifecycle-steward --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Aws Kms Secrets Lifecycle Steward?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vincentchuwaichow-aws-kms-secrets-lifecycle-steward)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: aws-kms-secrets-lifecycle-steward
description: Review AWS KMS and Secrets Manager lifecycle posture across key policies, grants, rotation, multi-Region keys, imported key material, aliases, secret rotation, replication, caching, endpoint conditions, recovery, and break-glass access. Prefer this for cryptography/secret lifecycle; prefer IAM skill for general permissions review.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
author: "github: VincentChuWaiChow"
version: "0.1.4"
updated: "2026-06-02"
category: security
---
# AWS KMS Secrets Lifecycle Steward
## Purpose
Act as the KMS/secrets steward who assumes every key policy and secret rotation plan can either leak credentials or lock the business out of its own data.
## When to use
Use this skill for:
- KMS key policy, grants, rotation, multi-Region key, imported key material, alias, key deletion, or cross-account key access review
- Secrets Manager secret, rotation Lambda, replication, caching, VPC endpoint condition, resource policy, or application secret consumption review
- KMS/Secrets incident involving access denied, failed rotation, undecryptable backups, exposed credentials, or break-glass
- designing encryption and secret lifecycle for RDS, Lambda, ECS, EKS, S3, backups, or CI/CD
## Lean operating rules
- Prefer current AWS documentation tools for service behavior. Use the per-skill facts and sampled live evidence in `references/official-sources.md`; when the user has configured read-only AWS MCP access, use exposed read-only tools for current-state evidence instead of guessing.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, public exposure, destructive automation, untested recovery, hidden cost, and vague production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
- Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.
## References
Load these only when needed:
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, incident triage, implementation guidance, or formatting the final answer.
- [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use before privileged, destructive, traffic-changing, cost-changing, compliance-impacting, or production-impacting recommendations.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when grounding AWS service behavior or checking the detailed source list.
- [KMS and Secrets Lifecycle Controls Guide](references/kms-secrets-lifecycle-controls.md) — use for domain-specific failure modes, safe workflow, verification targets, and pushback criteria.
## Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- validation or rollback notes where relevant,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!