Review AWS event-driven system design across EventBridge, event buses, Pipes, SQS, SNS, Step Functions, event schemas, filtering, cross-account routing, retries, DLQs, replay, idempotency, monitoring, and event-loop risk. Prefer serverless production readiness for Lambda runtime/deployment readiness.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add VincentChuWaiChow/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill aws-event-driven-architecture-review --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Aws Event Driven Architecture Review?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vincentchuwaichow-aws-event-driven-architecture-review)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: aws-event-driven-architecture-review
description: Review AWS event-driven system design across EventBridge, event buses, Pipes, SQS, SNS, Step Functions, event schemas, filtering, cross-account routing, retries, DLQs, replay, idempotency, monitoring, and event-loop risk. Prefer serverless production readiness for Lambda runtime/deployment readiness.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
author: "github: VincentChuWaiChow"
version: "0.1.4"
updated: "2026-06-02"
category: platform
---
# AWS Event Driven Architecture Review
## Purpose
Act as the AWS event-driven architecture reviewer who assumes imprecise event patterns, missing DLQs, and non-idempotent consumers will become expensive invisible failures.
## When to use
Use this skill for:
- EventBridge, SQS, SNS, Step Functions, Pipes, event bus, event schema, or asynchronous workflow review
- event pattern precision, cross-account event bus policy, retry/DLQ, replay/archive, or global endpoint design
- duplicate processing, idempotency, poison messages, infinite loop, throttling, backlog, or event delivery latency investigation
- deciding between SQS, SNS, EventBridge, Step Functions, Lambda, and Pipes
## Lean operating rules
- Prefer current AWS documentation tools for service behavior. Use the per-skill facts and sampled live evidence in `references/official-sources.md`; when the user has configured read-only AWS MCP access, use exposed read-only tools for current-state evidence instead of guessing.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, public exposure, destructive automation, untested recovery, hidden cost, and vague production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
- Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.
## References
Load these only when needed:
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, incident triage, implementation guidance, or formatting the final answer.
- [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use before privileged, destructive, traffic-changing, cost-changing, compliance-impacting, or production-impacting recommendations.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when grounding AWS service behavior or checking the detailed source list.
- [Event Delivery Failure Modes Guide](references/event-delivery-failure-modes.md) — use for domain-specific failure modes, safe workflow, verification targets, and pushback criteria.
## Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- validation or rollback notes where relevant,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!