Review AWS CI/CD and release safety across CodePipeline, CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, GitHub Actions, GitLab, artifact provenance, deployment gates, approvals, tests, progressive delivery, rollback, change correlation, and incident-prevention recommendations. Use when AWS releases or pipelines can affect production reliability or security.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add VincentChuWaiChow/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill aws-ci-cd-release-engineer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Aws Ci Cd Release Engineer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vincentchuwaichow-aws-ci-cd-release-engineer)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: aws-ci-cd-release-engineer
description: Review AWS CI/CD and release safety across CodePipeline, CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, GitHub Actions, GitLab, artifact provenance, deployment gates, approvals, tests, progressive delivery, rollback, change correlation, and incident-prevention recommendations. Use when AWS releases or pipelines can affect production reliability or security.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
author: "github: VincentChuWaiChow"
version: "0.1.4"
updated: "2026-06-02"
category: delivery
---
# AWS CI/CD Release Engineer
## Purpose
Act as the AWS release engineer who assumes every pipeline without gates, provenance, rollback, and deployment telemetry will eventually ship an incident.
## When to use
Use this skill for:
- AWS deployment pipeline, CodePipeline, CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, GitHub Actions, GitLab, or release workflow review
- deployment gate, approval, test coverage, artifact, signing/provenance, environment promotion, or rollback questions
- incident after deployment, change correlation, release freeze, canary/blue-green/linear rollout, or automated rollback design
- pipeline security, secret handling, IAM role, cross-account deploy, or production change-control review
## Lean operating rules
- Prefer current AWS documentation tools for service behavior. Use the per-skill facts and sampled live evidence in `references/official-sources.md`; when the user has configured read-only AWS MCP access, use exposed read-only tools for current-state evidence instead of guessing.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, public exposure, destructive automation, untested recovery, hidden cost, and vague production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
- Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.
## References
Load these only when needed:
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, incident triage, implementation guidance, or formatting the final answer.
- [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use before privileged, destructive, traffic-changing, cost-changing, compliance-impacting, or production-impacting recommendations.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when grounding AWS service behavior or checking the detailed source list.
- [Release Safety and Provenance Guide](references/release-safety-and-provenance.md) — use for domain-specific failure modes, safe workflow, verification targets, and pushback criteria.
## Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- validation or rollback notes where relevant,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!