Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Architecture Review

ASecurity

Reviews the system architecture for structural issues, dependency cycles, layer violations, scalability concerns, and single points of failure. Use for periodic health checks or before major new features.

7 stars
0 votes
0 copies
3 views
Added 5/28/2026
ai-agentsgobashnodegitapidatabasefrontendsecurity

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 5/28/2026

$npx -y skills add viknesh20-20/claude-code-tool-kit --skill architecture-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Architecture Review?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Architecture Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/viknesh20-20-architecture-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/viknesh20-20-architecture-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: architecture-review
description: "Reviews the system architecture for structural issues, dependency cycles, layer violations, scalability concerns, and single points of failure. Use for periodic health checks or before major new features."
argument-hint: "[component, module, or 'full' for entire project]"
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash
---

# Architecture Review

## Project Structure
!`find . -type f -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/.git/*" -not -path "*/vendor/*" -not -path "*/__pycache__/*" -not -path "*/target/*" -not -path "*/bin/*" -not -path "*/obj/*" -not -path "*/.next/*" -not -path "*/dist/*" -not -path "*/build/*" 2>/dev/null | head -80`

## Directory Layout
!`tree -L 3 -I "node_modules|.git|vendor|__pycache__|target|bin|obj|.next|dist|build" 2>/dev/null || find . -type d -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/.git/*" -not -path "*/vendor/*" -maxdepth 3 2>/dev/null`

## Package/Module Config
!`cat package.json go.mod Cargo.toml pyproject.toml requirements.txt *.csproj pom.xml 2>/dev/null | head -60`

---

## Review Areas

### 1. Project Structure & Organization
- Is the directory layout clear and consistent?
- Does it follow established conventions for the stack? (e.g., src/, app/, lib/, pkg/)
- Are related files co-located or scattered?
- Is there a clear entry point?

### 2. Dependency Architecture
- Map the dependency graph between major modules/packages
- Identify **circular dependencies** — modules that import each other
- Check for **layer violations** — e.g., presentation layer importing directly from data layer
- Look for **god modules** — modules that everything depends on
- Assess coupling: can modules be changed independently?

### 3. Separation of Concerns
- Is business logic separated from framework/transport code?
- Are side effects (I/O, network, database) isolated at boundaries?
- Is configuration separated from code?
- Are there clear interfaces between layers?

### 4. Scalability Considerations
- Stateless vs stateful components — which components hold state?
- Are there bottlenecks that would fail under load?
- Database query patterns — are they efficient at scale?
- Caching strategy — what is cached, where, and when invalidated?
- Background job handling — how are long-running tasks managed?

### 5. Reliability & Resilience
- **Single points of failure**: What happens if any component goes down?
- **Error boundaries**: Where do errors propagate, and are they caught?
- **Retry logic**: For external service calls, is there retry with backoff?
- **Graceful degradation**: Does the system handle partial failures?
- **Health checks**: Are there endpoints or mechanisms to monitor health?

### 6. Security Architecture
- Authentication and authorization boundaries
- Where is input validation enforced?
- How are secrets managed?
- API rate limiting and abuse prevention

---

## Output Format

### Architecture Diagram (ASCII)
```
┌─────────┐     ┌─────────┐     ┌──────────┐
│ Frontend │────▶│   API   │────▶│ Database │
└─────────┘     └─────────┘     └──────────┘
                     │
                     ▼
               ┌───────────┐
               │  External  │
               │  Services  │
               └───────────┘
```

### Findings Table
| # | Area | Finding | Severity | Recommendation |
|---|------|---------|----------|----------------|

### Top Recommendations
Prioritized list of the most impactful architectural improvements.

### Overall Health
Rate: Healthy / Needs Attention / At Risk — with reasoning.

Attribution

viknesh20-20viknesh20-20
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from viknesh20-20 →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698461 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →