Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Tdd Migrate

ASecurity

TDD workflow for migrations - orchestrate agents, zero main context growth

530 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 5/29/2026
ai-agentstypescriptpythongobashsecurity

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 5/29/2026

$npx -y skills add vibeeval/vibecosystem --skill tdd-migrate --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Tdd Migrate?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Tdd Migrate
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/vibeeval-tdd-migrate/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vibeeval-tdd-migrate)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: tdd-migrate
description: TDD workflow for migrations - orchestrate agents, zero main context growth
allowed-tools: [Task, TodoWrite, Write, Read, Bash]
---

# TDD Migrate

Orchestrate TDD migrations with agents doing all work. Main context stays clean.

## When to Use

- "Port X from Python to TypeScript"
- "Create N adapters following existing pattern"
- "Migrate module to new architecture"
- "TDD implementation of multiple similar items"

## Parameters

```
/tdd-migrate <source_path> <target_path> --pattern <reference> --items "item1,item2,item3"
```

- `source_path`: Path to analyze (existing code)
- `target_path`: Where to create new code
- `pattern`: Reference file/pattern to follow
- `items`: Comma-separated list of things to create

## Workflow

```
Phase 0: YAML TODO List
    │
    ▼
Phase 1: TLDR Analysis ─────────────────┐
    │                                    │
    ▼                                    │ Parallel scouts
Phase 2: Write Failing Tests ───────────┤ per item
    │                                    │
    ▼                                    │
Phase 3: Implement (minimal) ───────────┤
    │                                    │
    ▼                                    │
Phase 4: Build + Pass Tests ────────────┘
    │
    ▼
Phase 5: QLTY Check ────────────────────┐
    │                                    │ Parallel
Phase 6: Review Agent Validates ────────┘
    │
    ▼
Phase 7: TLDR Diff (new vs reference)
    │
    ▼
Phase 8: Fix Issues (if any)
    │
    ▼
Complete
```

## Key Principles

1. **Main context = orchestration only**
   - Never read files directly (use scout)
   - Never implement directly (use kraken/spark)
   - Never run tests directly (use validator)
   - Only pipe context and coordinate

2. **Agents do ALL work**
   | Task | Agent |
   |------|-------|
   | Explore/analyze | scout |
   | Write tests + implement | kraken |
   | Quick fixes | spark |
   | Run tests/validate | validator |
   | Code review | critic |

3. **Parallel where independent**
   - All items can be implemented in parallel if independent
   - Review + QLTY run in parallel
   - TLDR analysis runs in parallel with planning

4. **Review after each major step**
   - After implementation: critic reviews
   - After fixes: validator re-validates

## Instructions

### Step 0: Create YAML TODO

Write a YAML plan file to `thoughts/shared/plans/<name>-tdd.yaml`:

```yaml
---
title: <Migration Name>
date: <today>
type: implementation-plan
approach: TDD (test → build → pass → review)

items:
  - name: item1
    file: <target_path>/item1.ts
    test: <target_path>/__tests__/item1.test.ts
    deps: []
  - name: item2
    # ...

reference: <pattern_file>

workflow:
  per_item:
    1: Write failing test
    2: Implement minimal
    3: Build
    4: Pass test
    5: QLTY check
    6: Review
  final:
    7: Integration test
    8: TLDR diff
```

### Step 1: Launch Scout Agents (parallel)

```
Task (scout): Analyze <source_path> with TLDR
Task (scout): Analyze <pattern> to understand structure
Task (scout): Read migration handoff if exists
```

### Step 2: Launch Kraken Agents (parallel per item)

For each item, launch ONE kraken that does full TDD:

```
Task (kraken): Implement <item> using TDD workflow
  1. Read pattern file
  2. Write failing test
  3. Implement
  4. Run: bun test <test_file>
  5. Run: qlty check <impl_file>
```

### Step 3: Review + Validate (parallel)

```
Task (critic): Review all new files against pattern
Task (validator): Run full test suite
Task (validator): QLTY check all files
```

### Step 4: Fix Issues

If critic/validator found issues:

```
Task (spark): Fix <specific issue>
Task (validator): Re-validate
```

### Step 5: TLDR Diff

```
Task (validator): TLDR diff new files vs reference
  - tldr structure <new_file> --lang <lang>
  - tldr structure <reference> --lang <lang>
  - Compare patterns
```

### Step 6: Update Continuity

Update ledger with completed work.

## Example: Rigg Adapters

```bash
/tdd-migrate ~/your-project/src/sdk/providers \
  ~/your-project/src/sdk/providers \
  --pattern lmstudio.ts \
  --items "xai,cerebras,togetherai,deepinfra,perplexity"
```

Resulted in:
- 5 parallel kraken agents
- 39 tests passing
- All adapters working
- ~15 minutes total

## Anti-Patterns (AVOID)

| Bad | Good |
|-----|------|
| Read files in main context | Launch scout agent |
| Write code in main context | Launch kraken/spark agent |
| Run tests in main context | Launch validator agent |
| Skip review | Always launch critic |
| Sequential items | Parallel krakens |
| Fix in main context | Launch spark |

## Agent Prompts

### Scout (analysis)
```
Explore <path> to understand:
1. Structure/patterns
2. Interfaces/types
3. Dependencies
Return actionable summary for implementation.
```

### Kraken (TDD)
```
Implement <item> using TDD:
1. Read <pattern> for structure
2. Write failing test to <test_path>
3. Implement minimal to <impl_path>
4. Run: <test_command>
5. Run: qlty check <impl_path>
Report: status, issues, files created.
```

### Critic (review)
```
Review <files> against <pattern>:
1. Pattern compliance
2. Type safety
3. Missing registrations
4. Security issues
DO NOT edit. Report issues only.
```

### Spark (fix)
```
Fix <specific issue>:
1. Read <file>
2. Make minimal edit
3. Verify fix
```

### Validator (test)
```
Validate <files>:
1. Run <test_command>
2. Run qlty check
3. Report pass/fail/issues
```

## Success Criteria

- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] QLTY reports no issues
- [ ] Critic found no critical issues
- [ ] TLDR diff shows pattern compliance
- [ ] All items registered/exported properly

Attribution

vibeevalvibeeval
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from vibeeval →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698461 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →